Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Type: Oral
Session: 711. Cell Collection and Processing: Comparative studies and Novel Agents
Objectives: 1) To compare peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ counts, CD34+ apheresis yield, toxicity, and post-ASCT engraftment in patients mobilized with tbo-filgrastim versus filgrastim.
Methods: Participants were at least 18-years-old and had multiple myeloma (MM) or non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL). Those with impaired hematologic function and those who had undergone a previous ASCT mobilization were excluded. Participants were randomized (1:1) to tbo-filgrastim or filgrastim. Tbo-filgrastim/filgrastim (10mcg/kg) was administered daily for 5 days. On the evening of Day 4, plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg) was administered; apheresis (20L) was performed on Day 5. If a participant failed to achieve the target collection goal (5.0x106 cells/kg) on Day 5, he/she continued to receive daily tbo-filgrastim/filgrastim, plerixafor, and apheresis for a maximum of 3 additional days. Participants who subsequently underwent ASCT were followed for platelet and neutrophil engraftment.
Statistics: PB CD34+ counts and CD34+ apheresis yields were compared using Mann-Whitney U, engraftment using log-rank.
Results: At the time of abstract submission, corresponding with interim analysis 1, 51 participants were enrolled and 49 were evaluable for analysis; 24 received tbo-filgrastim, 25 filgrastim. The median age was 60 years (range 40-77); 63% (31) were male; 86% (42) had MM, 14% (7) NHL. Both treatment arms were similar in demographics and baseline blood counts.
Post-mobilization PB CD34+ counts were similar between both arms. The median PB CD34+ count on day 4 (pre-plerixafor) was 20/mcL for tbo-filgrastim and 22/mcL for filgrastim (p=0.647); on Day 5 pre-apheresis it was for 94/mcL for tbo-filgrastim and 92/mcL for filgrastim (p=0.726). CD34+ apheresis yield was also similar; the median Day 5 CD34+/kg apheresis yield was 10.9x106 for tbo-filgrastim and 12.0x106 for filgrastim (p=0.889).
Seventy-five percent of the tbo-filgrastim arm reached the collection goal after one day of apheresis, 76% of the filgrastim arm did (p=0.935). Ninety-six percent of patients on the tbo-filgrastim arm reached the goal in 4 or less days of apheresis, 92% of the filgrastim arm did (p=0.576). All patients treated collected > 2.0x106 cells/kg, the minimum required for ASCT, following < 2 days of apheresis. Both treatment arms had similar toxicity.
Thirty-nine patients have subsequently undergone ASCT and evaluable for engraftment, 18 on the tbo-filgrastim arm and 21 on the filgrastim arm. The median interval of neutrophil engraftment for tbo-filgrastim was 12 days compared to 11 for filgrastim (p=0.178); the median interval of platelet engraftment was 17 days for both arms (p=0.238).
Mobilization, collection, toxicity, and engraftment data are summarized in Table 1.
Conclusion: Tbo-filgrastim appears to be similar to filgrastim for ASCT mobilization in patients with MM or NHL. Planned study enrollment is 100 evaluable patients; updated study results will be presented.
Table 1
Tbo-Filgrastim |
Filgrastim |
|
PB CD34+/mcl on Day 41 (median & range) |
20 (4-68) |
22 (1-115) |
PB CD34+/mcl on Day 5 (median & range) |
94 (18-187) |
92 (11-314) |
CD34+/kg x106 yield on Day 5 (median & range) |
10.9 (1.4-21.2) |
12.0 (1.3-28.4) |
CD34+/kg yield >2.0 on Day 5 |
96% |
92% |
CD34+/kg yield >5.0 on Day 5 |
75% |
76% |
CD34+/kg yield >2.0 in < 4 days |
100% |
100% |
CD34+/kg Yield >5.0 in < 4 days |
96% |
92% |
Post-ASCT Engraftment |
||
Days to Neutrophil Engraftment (median & range) |
12 (10-20) |
11 (10-13) |
Days to Platelet Engraftment (median & range) |
17 (13-23) |
17 (13-22) |
1- Prior to plerixafor dose
Disclosures: Vij: Celgene, Onyx, Takeda, Novartis, BMS, Sanofi, Janssen, Merck: Consultancy ; Takeda, Onyx: Research Funding . Abboud: Teva Phamaceutical: Research Funding .
See more of: Cell Collection and Processing
See more of: Oral and Poster Abstracts
*signifies non-member of ASH