Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Type: Oral
Session: 623. Lymphoma: Chemotherapy, excluding Pre-Clinical Models: NHL – New Drugs
An ongoing Phase 1 (NCT01607892) open label, dose escalation, multi-center study in hematological malignancies was designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of selinexor as well as response rate as the secondary objective. A maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not identified yet in this study, but based on the ongoing Phase1 study of selinexor in pts with solid tumors, a MTD of 65 mg/m2 twice weekly was determined. The goal of the analyses reported here was to identify the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) based on both tolerability and efficacy in patients with heavily pretreated hematological malignancies.
Methods: A subset (N=157) of the Phase 1 patient population received oral selinexor twice weekly (8 doses/28-d cycle). General clinical observations suggested that doses of selinexor >35 mg/m2 (> ~60 mg flat dose) are associated with suboptimal tolerability. Therefore, based on the actual dose administered, patients were divided into groups receiving 45-65 mg (median 60 mg; N=59) and >65 mg (70-160 mg; median 90 mg, N=98) for comparison of safety and efficacy endpoints. The majority of the patients have heavily pretreated myeloma, NHL, and AML.
Results: 157 pts received 45-160 mg selinexor twice weekly (89 M/68 F, median age 66 yr; median 4 prior regimens). The most common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (66%), nausea (64%), anorexia (55%), vomiting (38%), which were mostly gr 1/2, and thrombocytopenia (44%), which was mostly grade 3/4. Incidence of certain selinexor-related high grade (3/4) adverse events was greater in pts receiving >65 mg selinexor vs those receiving 45-65 mg (Table 1). Grade 3 nausea (4%), anorexia (3%), vomiting (3%) and hypokalemia (3%) were observed in the >65 mg group but were not seen in the 45-65 mg group. Grade 3 and 4 anemia were 19% vs 14% and 4% vs 2% for the >65 mg vs 45-65 mg groups, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia was similar in both groups, but slightly higher in the >65 mg group, with 8% and 24 % in the 45-65 mg group vs 12% and 27% in the >65 mg group. Neutropenia was also very similar in Grade 3 and 4 toxicity for both groups with 10% and 12% in the 45-65 mg group vs 11% and 10% in the >65 mg group. In contrast, high grade cataract was only seen in the 45-65 mg group (8%; 3 gr 3, 1 gr 4). Selinexor-induced weight loss, as compared to baseline, was maximal by the end of cycle 2 in both dose groups, without further loss through at least cycle 4, but the >65 mg group lost on average >5-fold more weight (average of 3.8 ± 1.1 kg vs 0.7 ± 0.1 kg in the 65 mg group from 56 d– 126 d; p<0.001). Also, pts in the 45-65 mg group remained on study longer (average of 101 d vs 69 d in the >65 mg group; p=0. 05). In contrast, overall efficacy in the two dose groups was comparable, with 5 complete responses (CRs, 10%) and an overall response rate (ORR) of 23% in the 45-65 mg group and 4 CRs (5%) and ORR of 24% in the >65 mg group. A listing of all responses for both groups can be seen in Table 2.
Conclusions: While efficacy is comparable, doses of selinexor from 45-65 mg (median 60 mg) are better tolerated than doses >65 mg, based upon decreased weight loss, incidence of high grade AEs, and greater numbers of days on study. Based on this superior risk-benefit, a flat dose of 60 mg selinexor, twice weekly, is the RP2D for patients with hematological cancers. Similar results have been observed for solid tumors.
Disclosures: Chen: Celgene: Consultancy , Honoraria , Research Funding . Jacoby: Novo Nordisk: Consultancy ; Sunesis: Research Funding . Stone: AROG: Consultancy ; Celator: Consultancy ; Novartis: Research Funding ; Pfizer: Consultancy ; Juno: Consultancy ; Celgene: Consultancy ; Karyopharm: Consultancy ; Amgen: Consultancy ; Agios: Consultancy ; Roche/Genetech: Consultancy ; Abbvie: Consultancy ; Sunesis: Consultancy , Other: DSMB for clinical trial ; Merck: Consultancy . Baz: Sanofi: Research Funding ; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding ; Karyopharm: Research Funding ; Millennium: Research Funding . Gabrail: Sanofi: Honoraria , Speakers Bureau ; Janssen: Speakers Bureau ; BI: Honoraria , Speakers Bureau ; Onyx: Honoraria , Speakers Bureau . Wang: Celgene: Research Funding . Martin: Janssen: Consultancy , Honoraria ; Acerta: Consultancy ; Gilead: Consultancy ; Celgene: Consultancy ; Novartis: Consultancy ; Bayer: Consultancy . Siegel: Celgene Corporation: Consultancy , Speakers Bureau ; Amgen: Speakers Bureau ; Takeda: Speakers Bureau ; Novartis: Speakers Bureau ; Merck: Speakers Bureau . Marshall: Karyopharm: Employment . Saint-Martin: Karyopharm: Employment . Carlson: Karyopharm: Employment . Shacham: Karyopharm: Employment , Equity Ownership . Kauffman: Karyopharm: Employment , Equity Ownership . Kuruvilla: Gilead: Consultancy ; Hoffmann LaRoche: Consultancy , Honoraria , Research Funding ; Janssen: Consultancy , Honoraria ; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy , Honoraria ; Merck: Honoraria ; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria ; Lundbeck: Honoraria ; Karyopharm: Honoraria .
See more of: Lymphoma: Chemotherapy, excluding Pre-Clinical Models
See more of: Oral and Poster Abstracts
*signifies non-member of ASH