-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

4397 Very Good Response and Overall Survival after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Systemic Light Chain Amyloidosis; Results of a Non-Interventional Study By the Plasma Cell Disorder Subcommittee of the Chronic Malignancy Working Party of the EBMT

Clinical Allogeneic Transplantation: Results
Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 732. Clinical Allogeneic Transplantation: Results: Poster III
Monday, December 7, 2015, 6:00 PM-8:00 PM
Hall A, Level 2 (Orange County Convention Center)

Stefan Schönland1*, Ute Hegenbart, MD2*, Simona Iacobelli3, Jennifer Hoek4*, Jakob R. Passweg, MD5, Dominique Bordessoule6, Jean-Henri Bourhis, MD, PhD7, Martin R. Schipperus, MD, PhD8, Theo deWitte9*, Laurent Garderet, MD10 and Nicolaus Kröger11*

1University Hospital / Med. Dept. V / Amyloidosis Center, Heidelberg, Germany
2Amyloidosis Center, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
3Centro Interdipartimentale di Biostatistica e Bioinformatica, Università Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
4EBMT Data Office, Leiden, Netherlands
5Hematology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
6Hematologie Clinique, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France
7Division of Hematology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
8Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, Netherlands
9Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
10Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France
11University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

Introduction: Systemic light chain (AL-) amyloidosis is a rare protein deposition disorder which is caused by a monoclonal plasma cell or B cell disorder with poor prognosis if the heart is severely affected. In a retrospective EBMT analysis allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) performed from 1991 until 2003 has emerged as an effective treatment but was associated with a high non-relapse-mortality (NRM) (Schönland et al., Blood 2006).

Patients and Methods: We performed a prospective non-interventional study (NIS) within the EBMT using allo-SCT in AL amyloidosis patients. Primary endpoint was efficacy (best hematologic remission (HR) and organ response). Secondary endpoints were acute and chronic Graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD), NRM, non-hematologic toxicity, event-free and overall survival (OS). We selected those centres that had performed any allogeneic HSCT for AL amyloidosis in the past. We approached 24 centres, of which 6 participated. Fourteen patients have been included and were transplanted between 2006 and 2014. Median age at allo-SCT was 50 years (range, 41 – 60). Five patients had cardiac and 10 patients kidney involvement at diagnosis. As underlying hematologic disease one patient had a M. Waldenström, the other 13 patients had a clonal plasma cell dyscrasia. All but one patient were in a good performance status (80-100%) assessed by Karnofsky Index at allo-SCT. Previous chemotherapy included high-dose melphalan (HDM) with autologous stem cell transplantation in 11 patients as well as bortezomib, lenalidomide, melphalan, rituximab and steroids. Disease stages at allo-SCT were as follows: 2 CRs, 1 VGPR, 6 PRs, 3 no responses and 1 with progression. Two patients received myeloablative and 12 reduced intensity conditioning (RIC, TBI 2 Gy / fludarabine in 10 patients, TBI 6 Gy in one patient). Three patients received T cell depletion (2 with ATG, one with Campath). HDM 200 mg/m2 was applied prior to the one syngeneic SCT. Donors were: 8 identical siblings, 1 mismatched relative, 1 syngeneic, 3 matched unrelated donors and 1 mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD). Source of stem cells was peripheral blood in 13 and cord blood in 1 patient, respectively. Time from diagnosis to allo-SCT was 23 months in median (range, 4-61).

Results: All but one patient engrafted. Acute GvHD grade II-IV occurred in 4 patients and chronic GvHD in 9 patients (4 patients with limited and 5 with extensive disease, respectively). NRM occurred in 3 patients (GvHD, infection and suicide). One patient died due to progressive disease. 1- and 2-year-mortality was 14 and 21%, respectively. Best HR after allo-SCT was CR in 9 (64%). Ten patients were alive after an estimated median follow-up of 53 months (figure, continuous line) with an OS plateau beginning at 28 months post allo-SCT of 70%. Four patients relapsed or progressed and 7 patients were alive and relapse-free.

In addition, we updated the 19 AL patients of our published cohort (Schönland et al., Blood 2006). 1- and 2-year-mortality was 42 and 53%, respectively. Five (26%) patients were still alive after a cumulative median follow-up of 208 months, four of these living longer than 10 years after allo-SCT (figure, dashed-line).

Conclusion: Preliminary analysis of our NIS shows that allo-SCT is nowadays feasible and highly effective in selected patients with AL amyloidosis. In opposite to our retrospective analysis we observed a rather low NRM using mostly reduced-intensity conditioning with TBI 2 Gy and fludarabine. Furthermore, both analyses revealed rewarding long-term survival suggesting very good disease control. Therefore, allo-SCT might be a reasonable treatment option in young, medically fit and heavily pretreated patients (e.g. relapse or non-response after HDM).

Figure

Disclosures: Schönland: Prothena: Consultancy ; Janssen: Consultancy , Honoraria , Research Funding . Hegenbart: Janssen: Honoraria . Schipperus: Novartis: Consultancy . Garderet: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy .

*signifies non-member of ASH