-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

3316 Impact of Socioeconomic, Demographic and Health System Factors on Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Health Services and Outcomes Research – Malignant Diseases
Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 902. Health Services and Outcomes Research – Malignant Diseases: Poster II
Sunday, December 6, 2015, 6:00 PM-8:00 PM
Hall A, Level 2 (Orange County Convention Center)

Gaurav Goyal, MBBS1*, Lata Nawal, MPH2*, Kailash Mosalpuria, MD, MPH3 and Peter T. Silberstein, MD4

1Internal Medicine, CHI Health Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, NE
2Department of Epidemiology, University Of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
3Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
4Hematology/Oncology, Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, NE

Introduction

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common acute leukemia in adults. Once diagnosed, AML is usually treated aggressively with the goal of improving survival. In this study, we aim to evaluate the factors affecting delivery of treatment in patients with AML.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with AML from 2003 to 2013 from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). NCDB consists of demographic variables and survival outcomes of approximately 70% of all new cancer diagnoses in the United States and Puerto Rico. Univariate logistic regression was performed to calculate crude odds ratio for different variables.

Results
A total of 98,293 patients were diagnosed with AML from 2003-2013, of which 24% (23,328) did not receive any systemic therapy (ST). On univariate analysis, the odds of receiving treatment were lower among females (Odds Ratio [OR] =0.97; 0.94-0.99), elderly (OR =0.15; 0.15-0.16), and Medicare patients (OR =0.23; 0.22- 0.23). Patients with one or more comorbidities had lower odds of receiving treatment compared to patients without any comorbidities (OR for 1 comorbidity =0.65; 0.63- 0.67, and OR for ≥ 2 comorbidities =0.42; 0.40-0.44). The odds of receiving ST were lower in community hospitals as compared to academic centers (OR= 0.34; 0.32-0.35). African Americans had higher odds of receiving ST compared to Whites (OR= 1.20; 1.13- 1.26). The patients belonging to households with higher income (>$49K) had higher odds of receiving ST (OR=1.14; 1.08-1.20). The histologic subtype associated with highest odds of receiving treatment was acute promyelocytic leukemia (OR=2.43; 2.27- 2.59). Compared to the reference period 2003-2006, patients diagnosed with AML during the later time period had higher odds for receiving therapy: 2007-2010 (OR =1.11; 1.08- 1.15), and 2011-2013 (OR =1.27; 1.22- 1.31) respectively (Table 1).

Conclusions

Although the number of people receiving therapy for AML has increased over time, factors like older age, comorbidities, lower household income, having Medicare, and being diagnosed at a community hospital were associated with lesser odds of receiving ST. More studies are needed to assess the impact of these factors on patient survival.

Table1: Systemic therapy in AML

Variable

 

Systemic Therapy         (% of total)

n = 74965

No Systemic Therapy              (% of total)

n = 23328

Odds ratio   (95% CI)

Gender

Male

41

13

1.00

Female

35

11

0.97 (0.94, 0.99)

Age

≤ 70 y

54

6

1.00

> 70 y

23

17

0.15 (0.15, 0.16)

Race

White

59

20

1.00

Black

7

2

1.20 (1.13, 1.26)

Others

10

2

1.53 (1.45, 1.61)

Year of diagnosis

2003-2006

24

8

1.00

2007-2010

27

9

1.11(1.08,1.15)

2011-2013

25

7

1.27 (1.22, 1.31)

Insurance

Private

32

4

1.00

Medicaid

7

1

1.16 (1.07, 1.26)

Medicare

29

17

0.23 (0.22, 0.23)

No Insurance

3

1

0.61 (0.55, 0.66)

Others

5

1

0.61 (0.57, 0.66)

Household income

< $28K

7

2

1.00

$28K -$32,999

10

3

1.04 (0.98, 1.11)

$33K - $38,999

14

5

1.01 (0.95, 1.08)

$39K - $48,999

18

6

1.05 (0.99, 1.11)

$49K +

27

8

1.14 (1.08, 1.20)

Comorbidity

None

58

15

1.00

Only 1 comorbid condition

14

5

0.65 (0.63, 0.67)

Two or more comorbid conditions

5

3

0.42 (0.40, 0.44)

Histology

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

42

16

1.00

Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL)

8

1

2.43 (2.27, 2.59)

 

Acute Myelomonocytic Leukemia (AMyL)

6

2

1.25 (1.18, 1.32)

Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Multilineage Dysplasia (AMLMD)

5

2

1.11 (1.05, 1.18)

Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Maturation (AMLM)

4

1

1.56 (1.44, 1.68)

 Acute Myeloid Leukemia without Maturation (AMLWM)

3

1

2.02 (1.85, 2.21)

 Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Minimal Differentation

2

1

0.98 (0.91, 1.06)

 Other Specified Types (OST)

2

1

1.23 (1.11, 1.36)

Erythroleukemia

2

1

1.07 (0.97, 1.18)

Facility Type (n= 83431)

Academic

50

8

1.00

Community

29

13

0.34 (0.32, 0.35)

 AML: Acute myeloid leukemia

Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

*signifies non-member of ASH