-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

3836 Classification of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome Based on Molecular Profiling

Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Biology, Cytogenetics and Molecular Markers in Diagnosis and Prognosis
Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 617. Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Biology, Cytogenetics and Molecular Markers in Diagnosis and Prognosis: Poster III
Monday, December 7, 2015, 6:00 PM-8:00 PM
Hall A, Level 2 (Orange County Convention Center)

Sally Agersborg, MD, PhD1*, Maya Thangavelu, PhD1, Wanlong Ma, BS1*, Steven Brodie, Ph.D2*, Christopher Mixon, MD3*, Wayne Chen, MD1* and Maher Albitar1

1NeoGenomics Laboratories, Irvine, CA
2NeoGenomics Laboratories, Ft. Myers, FL
3NeoGenomics Laboratories, Nashville, TN

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is currently distinguished from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) based on the presence of 20% blasts in bone marrow, an arbitrary cut-off adopted by the WHO classification and replacing the 30% cut-off required by the older FAB (French, American and British) classification.   Patients with t(15;17), t(8;21), or inversion 16 cytogenetic abnormalities are classified as having AML irrespective of the percentage of blasts.   We explored the possibility that currently defined molecular abnormalities can distinguish AML from MDS without relying on an arbitrary percentage of blasts in the bone marrow.  We compared the molecular profiles obtained by next generation sequencing (NGS) from consecutive patients with a clinical diagnosis of AML or MDS by WHO criteria.

Methods:  NGS data from 251 patients with the diagnosis of AML and 294 patients with the diagnosis of MDS was studied.  All samples were analyzed using a panel of 25 genes including FLT3, NPM1 SF3B1, CBL, DNMT3A, ASXL1, BRAF, CEBPA, CSFR3, ETV6, EZH2, IDH1, IDH2, JAK2, c-KIT, KRAS, NRAS, PHF6, PTPN11, RUNX1, SETBP1, TET2, TP53, WT1, and ZRSR2. We compared the frequency of mutations in each gene between AML and MDS patients.  

Results:   Mutations in FLT3 and NPM1 were uniquely and commonly detected in AML (27% and 22%, respectively).   In contrast, mutations in SF3B1 gene were uniquely dominant (22%) in MDS and FLT3 and NPM1 mutations were rare (2% and 3%, respectively).  SF3B1 mutations were extremely rare in AML (1%).  Overall, 102 (41%) of all AML patients had mutations in either FLT3 or NPM1 and 8% of AML patients had mutations in both FLT3 and NPM1.  In addition, WT1 gene was mutated in 8% of AML cases, but none of the MDS cases showed WT1 mutation.  TET2 gene was commonly mutated in both AML and MDS (25% and 36%, respectively), but the frequency was significantly higher in MDS (P=0.003).   IDH1, IDH2, NRAS, and PTPN11 were mutated slightly more often in AML than in MDS, while ASXL1, EZH2, and ZRSR2 were more frequently mutated in MDS than in AML.  There was no statistically significant difference in mutation frequency between AML and MDS for the other genes analyzed. 

Conclusion:   Mutations in FLT3, NPM1 and WT1 are molecular abnormalities characteristically detected in patients with AML and can be used as objective criteria for the classification of AML rather than blast count in bone marrow.  These mutations are detected in 49% of AML patients.  This suggests that approximately half of AML patients can be diagnosed based on the detection of molecular abnormalities, irrespective of bone marrow morphology.   The presence of mutation in SF3B1 gene is also a characteristic molecular finding for MDS.  

  

 

AML (No=251)

MDS (No=294)

P-Value

 

No

%

No

%

 

FLT3

68

27

5

2

0.00001

NPM1

55

22

8

3

0.0001

SF3B1

3

1

66

22

0.00006

CBL

4

2

10

3

NS

DNMT3A

51

20

51

17

0.07

ASXL1

44

18

75

26

0.01

BRAF

3

1

1

0

NS

CEBPA

38

15

51

17

NS

CSFR3

11

4

11

4

NS

ETV6

3

1

6

2

NS

EZH2

8

3

25

9

0.03

IDH1

20

8

7

2

0.03

IDH2

17

7

7

2

0.04

JAK2

4

2

10

3

NS

KIT

2

1

0

0

NS

KRAS

11

4

6

2

NS

NRAS

34

14

18

6

0.01

PHF6

5

2

2

1

NS

PTPN11

26

10

6

2

0.01

RUNX1

31

12

33

11

NS

SETBP1

5

2

9

3

NS

TET2

64

25

105

36

0.003

TP53

61

24

75

26

NS

WT1

19

8

0

0

0.01

ZRSR2

7

3

30

10

0.02

 

Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

*signifies non-member of ASH