-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

3222 RIC Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for High Risk CLL Followed By Preemptive MRD-Based Immunointervention - Intermediate Results from the Phase II ICLL03 Ricac-Pmm Trial (FILO & SFGM-TC French intergroup)

Clinical Allogeneic Transplantation: Results
Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 732. Clinical Allogeneic Transplantation: Results: Poster II
Sunday, December 6, 2015, 6:00 PM-8:00 PM
Hall A, Level 2 (Orange County Convention Center)

Olivier Tournilhac, MD, PhD1,2*, Magali Le Garff-Tavernier, PharmD, PhD3*, Reza Tabrizi, MD4, Stephanie Nguyen quoc, MD5*, Faize Legrand-Izadifar, MD6*, Patrice Chevallier, MD, PhD7*, Oumedaly Reman, MD8, Cecile Tomowiak, MD9*, Cecile Borel, MD10*, Sylvie Francois, MD11*, Pascal Turlure, MD12*, Sébastien Maury13*, Gaelle Guillerm, MD14*, Luc Fornecker, MD15*, Richard Lemal, MD16*, Claire Quiney17*, Carole Bellanger18*, Laure Calvet, MD18*, Lauren Veronese, MD, PhD19*, Aurelie Cabrespine, PhD18*, Mathieu Coudert20*, Jacques-Olivier Bay, MD, PhD21, Helene Merle-Beral, MD, PhD3 and Nathalie Dhedin, MD22,23*

1Service d'Hematologie Clinique et de Therapie Cellulaire, CHU, Universite d'Auvergne, EA7283, CIC501, Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont Ferrand, France
2FILO (French Innovative Leukemia Organization), Tours, France
3Department of Biological Hematology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital and Pierre et Marie Curie University, Paris, France
4CHU Bordeaux, Hematology, Pessac, France
5Department of Hematology, Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, Paris, France
6CHU, Service d’hématologie clinique, département de greffe de moelle, Nice, France
7Department of Hematology, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
8Hematology, CHU, Caen, France
9CHU, Poitiers, France
10CHU, Toulouse, France
11CHU Angers, Angers, France
12Hematology Department, CHU Limoges, Limoges, France
13Hematology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
14Department of Hematology and Oncology, CH Augustin Morvan, Brest, France
15Oncology and Hematology, Hopital de Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France
16CHU Clermont Ferrand, Clermont Ferrand, France
17Service d’Hématologie Biologique, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
18Service d'Hematologie Clinique et de Therapie Cellulaire, CHU, Universite d'Auvergne, EA7283, CIC501, Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
19Service cytogénétique, CHU Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
20Unité de recherche clinique, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
21Department of Hematology, Service d'Hematologie Clinique et de Therapie Cellulaire, CHU, Universite d'Auvergne, EA7283, CIC501, Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
22SFGM-TC (Societe Francaise de Greffe de Moelle et de Therapie Cellulaire), Pierre Benite, France
23Department of Hematology, Adolescents and young adults unit, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France

Introduction Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains a valuable and potentially curative strategy in high-risk CLL. Post-ASCT relapse remains an important (30-40%) cause of failure, predicted by persisting positive minimal residual disease (MRD) at 12m post-ASCT. ASCT is also associated with a toxic mortality and with the burden of chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a preemptive immunointervention (PrIm) based on serial MRD assessment in high-risk CLL. (NCT01849939)

Methods Main inclusion criteria were (1) EBMT criteria for ASCT, (2) CLL in PR/CR, (3) mass ≤5cm, (4) age ≤70, (5) SORROR score ≤2 and (6) HLA donor (10/10). RIC regimen included fludarabine 120 mg/m2, IV busulfan 6.4 mg/kg, rabbit ATG 5mg/kg and CsA prophylaxy. Centralized 10-color flow cytometry blood MRD was assessed before and at M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, M6, M9 and M12 post-ASCT. MRD[-] was defined by blood detection <10e-4 at 2 consecutive time-points, confirmed (if possible) on bone marrow aspiration. PrIm algorithm, applied from D30 to M12, considered IWCCL response criteria, blood MRD and GVHD occurrence/severity. PrIm comprised tutored CsA early (≤4-5m), standard (6m) or late (7m) tapering and discontinuation (T&D). Early CsA T&D was followed in case of failure to achieve MRD[-] by 1-3 increasing DLI doses (1, 5 or 10x10e6 CD3/kg). Primary end point was the rate of MRD[-] at M12. Chimerism was assessed in parallel on full blood and on sorted CD3+ cells and was not a part of PrIm decision.

Results As of 2015, August the 1st, the 43 planned inclusions have been done. Before their last line prior to ASCT, pts had: (a) presence of a del(17p) in 1st line (n=24) or in relapse (n=3), (b) absence of del(17p) but relapse ≤2y post fludarabine-based combination (n=14) or post-autologous transplantation (n=1). At time of transplantation, 11/43 (26%) had achieved CR, 28/43 (65%) had achieved PR, 2/43 (5%) had SD with 2 unknown status. Six patients had undetectable MRD (limit of detection: 5x10-6). For the 37 other patients, the median pre-ASCT MRD level was 2.35%(0.014 to 70%).

The results of these 43 pts will be available in December 2015. This abstract describes the outcome of the 30 first consecutive pts including 26 pts evaluable [alive with ≥12m post-ASCT follow-up] and 4 pts non evaluable [death at M10 (n=1; sepsis) and at M8 (n=1 GVHD), EBV induced lymphoproliferation (n=1) and immediate graft rejection (n=1)], all included in the ITT analysis. In the 29 pts with full engraftment, the full blood chimerism at 3m and 12m was 99.1[62.1 ;99.8] and 99.5[59.4 ;99.9], and the T-cell specific chimerism was 99.2[5.2;99.8] and 99.6[21.1;99.8], with 30% and 25% >95% donor derived CD3+ cells respectively. MRD evolution followed different patterns (Table 1). At the M3 checkpoint, among evaluable patients, 10 were already MRD[-], and 16 were still MRD[+]. Then 10 pts became MRD[-] and 6 remained MRD[+]. This approach achieved 67% blood MRD[-] at M12 (ITT). When early CSA T&D had failed DLI done in 6 pts did not achieve MRD negativity. Finally, 6 pts (20%) remained MRD[+] at 12m.

At 12m FU, the rate of Gr≥2 aGVHD was (11/30) 37% (consecutive to early CsA T&D in 2 pts and to early CsA T&D followed by DLI in 1 pt) and the rate of extensive cGVHD was (5/29) 17% (consecutive to CsA T&D in 1 pt). Hence we observed the occurrence of Gr≥2 aGVHD and extensive cGVHD in 2/8 and 1/8 pts after early CsA T&D. We also observed one case of Gr≥2 aGVHD among the 6 pts who had early CsA T&D followed by DLI. Eighteen severe adverse events were reported, including the 2 aforementioned deaths. These events were not related to the study procedure (PrIm).

Discussion These preliminary data highlight the feasibility, safety and efficacy of a standardized PrIm strategy in high-risk CLL. As DLI appears to have limited impact when CsA T&D fails, the preemptive use of new agents should be considered at this point for persistent MRD[+] after 3-6m post-ASCT.

 

Table 1

M12 MRD

N

 

%

MRD[-] pre-ASCT remaining MRD[-]

[-]

2

7

MRD[+] (M1-2) spontaneously translating to MRD[-] within 3m

[-]

8

27

MRD[+] (M1-3) translating to MRD[-]

after early CsA T&D

concomitant of severe GVHD (≥G2 aGVHD and/or ext cGVHD)

[-]

10

8

2

33

MRD[+] (M1-3) remaining MRD[+]

despite early CsA T&D followed by DLI

despite early CsA T&D, transient MRD[-], relapse and DLI 

[+]

6

5

1

20

Non evaluable: toxic deaths (2), EBV LPD (1), graft rejection (1)

NE

4

13

Disclosures: Tournilhac: Janssen Cilag: Honoraria , Other: Travel support ; GSK: Other: Travel Support , Research Funding ; Mundiphrama: Honoraria , Other: Travel Support , Research Funding ; Celgene: Other: Travel support ; Gilead: Other: Travel Funding ; Roche: Other: Travel support , Research Funding .

*signifies non-member of ASH