Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone Vs Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed Multiple Myeloma: Results of the Phase 3 Study Endeavor (NCT01568866) According to Age Subgroup

Introduction: Carfilzomib is a selective proteasome inhibitor that is approved in the United States and other countries for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. The randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study ENDEAVOR (NCT01568866) met its primary end point, demonstrating a statistically and clinically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) for carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) compared with bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) (median 18.7 vs 9.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44–0.65; 1-sided P<0.001) (Dimopoulos et al, J Clin Oncol 2015;33:abstr 8509; Dimopoulos et al, Haematologica2015;100[s1]:abstr LB2071). Herein we present results of a preplanned subgroup analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes of the ENDEAVOR study according to age.

Methods: Adult patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (RMM; 1–3 prior regimens) were eligible. Patients in the Kd arm received K (30-min intravenous [IV] infusion) on days (D) 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 (20 mg/m² on D1, 2 [cycle 1]; 56 mg/m² thereafter) and dexamethasone (20 mg) on D1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23 of 28-day cycles. The Vd arm received V (1.3 mg/m²; IV or subcutaneously) on D1, 4, 8, and 11 and dexamethasone (20 mg) on D1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 of 21-day cycles. Treatment was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point of the study was PFS; secondary end points included overall survival, overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), safety, and rate of peripheral neuropathy (PN). The present analyses evaluated outcomes in patients grouped according to age (ie, <65, 65–74, and ≥75 years of age).

Results:A total of 929 patients were enrolled (intent-to-treat population; <65 years: Kd, n=223; Vd, n=210; 65–74 years: Kd, n=164; Vd, n=189; ≥75 years: Kd, n=77; Vd, n=66). Baseline patient and disease characteristics were generally well balanced between treatment arms within each age subgroup. PFS was improved with Kd vs Vd within each age subgroup (<65 years: median, not estimable vs 9.5 months [HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44–0.77]; 65–74 years: median, 15.6 months vs 9.5 months [HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.38–0.73]; ≥75 years: median, 18.7 months vs 8.9 months [HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.23–0.65]) (Table). Kaplan–Meier PFS curves by age subgroup are shown in the Figure. ORRs in each age group were also higher in the Kd arm compared with the Vd arm in each subgroup (<65 years: 74% vs 61% [odds ratio, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.21–2.74]; 65–74 years: 77% vs 66% [odds ratio, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.12–2.89]; ≥75 years: 84% vs 59% [odds ratio, 3.75; 95% CI, 1.71–8.24]). Rates of grade ≥3 adverse events of interest, including hypertension are shown in the Table. Grade ≥3 hypertension, dyspnea, cardiac failure, renal failure were more common with Kd vs Vd within each age subgroup. Rates of grade ≥2 PN were lower in the Kd arm across all subgroups compared with the Vd arm (<65 years: 6% vs 27% [odds ratio, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.09–0.32]; 65–74 years: 8% vs 34% [odds ratio, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.09–0.32]; ≥75 years: 3% vs 43% [odds ratio, 0.035; 95% CI, 0.008–0.16]). Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation occurred at similar frequencies in the Kd and Vd arms in the two younger-age subgroups (<65 years: 17% vs 15%; 65–74 years: 22% vs 22%), but at a higher frequency in the Vd arm for the oldest-age subgroup (≥75 years: 26% vs 35%). Deaths within 30 days post-treatment due to adverse events occurred at similar rates in the Kd and Vd arms within each age subgroup (<65 years: 3% vs 3%; 65–74 years: 5% vs 3%; ≥75 years: 4% vs 5%).

Conclusions: Kd demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in PFS and ORR compared with Vd within all age subgroups examined, with a trend toward a greater improvement in the eldest-age subgroup (≥75 years) than in the two younger-age subgroups (<65 and 65–74 years). The eldest-age subgroup in the Kd arm had an increased incidence of select grade ≥3 adverse events of interest, including cardiac failure and hypertension, compared with the younger-age subgroups in the Kd arm. Hypertension is a recognized but manageable complication in elderly patients and should be monitored. Overall, results suggest that Kd has a favorable benefit–risk profile in patients with RMM, irrespective of age.