-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

4245 Time to Spare Newly Diagnosed Non Transplant Eligible Myeloma (eNDMM) from Thalidomide

Myeloma: Therapy, excluding Transplantation
Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 653. Myeloma: Therapy, excluding Transplantation: Poster III
Monday, December 7, 2015, 6:00 PM-8:00 PM
Hall A, Level 2 (Orange County Convention Center)

Hélène Demarquette1*, Stéphanie Guidez1*, Artur J. Jurczyszyn, MD, PhD2*, Denis Caillot3*, Brigitte Pegourie, MD4*, Marie Lorraine Chretien5*, Charles Lancesseur6*, Lionel Karlin7*, Cristina M. Joao, MD, PhD8*, Claire Bories1*, Laurence Legros, MD9*, Laurent Garderet, MD10, Souhila Ikhlef11*, Martine Escoffre12*, Bruno Royer, MD13*, Laurent Voillat14*, Cyrille Hulin15*, Anne Banos, MD16*, Eric G. Voog, MD17, Anne-Marie Stoppa, MD18, Lofti Benboubker19*, Niels Abildgaard, MD, Professor20, Katell Le Du21*, Philippe Moreau22*, Thierry Facon1, Sonja Zweegman, MD, PhD23, Margaret MACRO, MD24*, Francesca Gay25*, Evangelos Terpos26 and Xavier Leleu, MD, PhD1,27

1Maladies du Sang, Hôpital Claude Huriez, CHRU Lille, Lille, France
2Department of Hematology, Cracow University Hospital, Krakow, Poland
3Hôpital du Bocage, Dijon, France
4Hôpital A.Michallon, CHU Grenoble, Grenoble, France
5CHRU Dijon, Dijon, France
6CHU Caen, Caen, France
7Service d'Hématologie, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Bénite, France
8Hematology department, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
9Hematology department, Hopital Archet 1, CHU Nice, Nice, France
10Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France
11Département d’hématologie, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France
12CHU Rennes, Rennes, France
13Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens, France
14Service Hemato-Oncologie, Centre Hospitalier QWillian Morey, Chalon-sur-Saone, France
15Service Hematologie, CHRU Hopitaux de Brabois, Vandoeuvre cedex, France
16Hematology Department, CH Cote basque, Bayonne, France
17Hematology Department, Le Mans, Centre Jean Bernard, Le Mans, France
18Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France
19CHU Tours Hopital Bretonneau, Tours, France
20Department of Hematology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
21CENTRE JEAN BERNARD, LE MANS, France
22Nantes University Hospital, Hôtel‐Dieu, Nantes, France
23Department of Hematology, VUMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
24CHU Caen, CAEN, France
25Myeloma Unit, Division of Hematology, University of Torino, A.O.U. S. Giovanni Battista, Torino, Italy
26Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Alexandra General Hospital, Athens, Greece
27Service d'hématologie et Thérapie cellulaire, Hopital La Mileterie, Poitiers, France

Background. Thalidomide is one of the most prescribed regimens upfront in eNDMM, e.g. elderly myeloma, essentially as melphalan-prednisone-Thalidomide (MPT). Several options are offered at 1st and 2nd relapse to patients initially exposed to Thalidomide with either bortezomib or lenalidomide-based therapy.

On the other hand, the second most prescribed drug in elderly myeloma upfront is Bortezomib, primarily as Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP), the 2nd standard of care upfront in Multiple Myeloma (MM) ineligible for transplantation. Interestingly, lenalidomide is the drug of choice at first relapse in the vast majority of cases in most countries where lenalidomide is approved at first relapse and beyond. In this situation, it is likely that the patients would not receive thalidomide throughout the disease course of myeloma. 

We sought to analyse whether patients not exposed to thalidomide upfront, and that were solely exposed to the 2 drugs, bortezomib-based regimen and lenalidomide-based therapy would have a lower survival than patients exposed to all 3 drugs, e.g. thalidomide, lenaldiomide and bortezomib.

Method. A total of 145 patients were recruited in this multicentric study, 46,2% were in the thalidomide upfront exposed arm and 53,8% had never been exposed to thalidomide. Patients were required to be aged ≥65 years, NDMM treated with either thalidomide upfront or never been exposed to thalidomide upfront or later in the myeloma disease course. If not exposed to thalidomide, the patients were to have received bortezomib upfront and lenalidomide first relapse or vice versa.

In the thalidomide group, all patients had MPT initially for a median of 8 cycles (range 3 – 12), at a median dose of thalidomide of 100mg/day (50-200), with 11% dose reduction. In the non-exposed thalidomide group, all patients had bortezomib upfront, patients received Vd, VCd or VMP upfront; lenalidomide was then given at first relapse to all patients. The median dose administered of bortezomib was 1.3mg/m², for a median of 5 cycles (2-9).

 

Results. Overall, the median age was 73 years (range, 65 - 85), with 35% aged >75. The M/F ratio was 1.1, 38% were ISS 3, the median b2m was 5.5mg/L, 26% had an ECOG score ≥ 2, 42% had renal insufficiency, 11% had elevated LDH, 8% presence of plasmacytoma, and 14% had adverse FISH (del17p, t(4;14) and or t(14;16)). There was no difference in patients’ characteristics across studied groups, according to exposure or not to thalidomide.

With a median follow-up of 5 years, 60% have died overall; 69% in the thalidomide exposed group versus 52% in the thalidomide non-exposed group (p=0.027). The median OS of thalidomide exposed patients was 55.7 months (46;65) versus 44 months (35;53) in the thalidomide non exposed patients (p=0.079). In the thalidomide exposed group, the median PFS of the thalidomide, bortezomib then lenalidomide lines were 27 months (24;30), 11 months (8;13) and 13 months (10;15). In the thalidomide non-exposed group, the median PFS of bortezomib then lenalidomide lines were 17 months (13;21) and 13 months (6;20).

We then studied the survival of patients from onset of first relapse in the thalidomide exposed group, e.g. upon treatment with bortezomib, followed by lenalidomide at subsequent relapse, 22.5 months (10;34) compared to patients in the thalidomide non-exposed group that received bortezomib upfront and lenalidomide at first relapse, 44 months (35;53), p=0.005.

Conclusion. Overall, thalidomide exposed versus non exposed groups had similar OS, while OS was significantly lower in the thalidomide exposed patients at first relapse onset versus in the thalidomide non exposed patients from diagnosis. This data seems to recommend use of bortezomib- and lenalidomide-based regimens as early as possible in the myeloma disease course, but not to abandon thalidomide. Study of the impact of thalidomide in the post bortezomib, lenalidomide and pomalidomide era might thus be important to study and optimize.

Disclosures: Karlin: Amgen: Honoraria ; BMS: Honoraria ; Janssen: Honoraria ; Celgene: Honoraria ; Sandoz: Honoraria , Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees . Legros: BMS: Speakers Bureau ; ARIAD: Speakers Bureau ; Novartis: Research Funding , Speakers Bureau . Garderet: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy . Hulin: Celgene Corporation: Honoraria ; Janssen: Honoraria ; Amgen: Honoraria ; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria . Stoppa: Janssen: Consultancy , Honoraria ; Amgen: Consultancy , Honoraria ; Celgene: Consultancy , Honoraria , Research Funding ; Novartis: Consultancy , Honoraria . Moreau: Janssen: Other: Adboard ; Novartis: Other: Adboard ; Takeda: Other: Adboard ; Amgen: Other: Adboard ; Celgene: Honoraria , Other: Adboard . Facon: Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees , Speakers Bureau ; Janssen: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees , Speakers Bureau ; Millenium: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees ; Onyx: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees ; BMS: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees ; Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees ; Amgen: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees ; Pierre Fabre: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees . Zweegman: Janssen: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees , Research Funding ; Takeda: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees , Research Funding ; Celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees , Research Funding . MACRO: celgene: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees ; jansen: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees ; millenium: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees . Terpos: Janssen: Honoraria ; Novartis: Honoraria ; Celgene: Honoraria ; Amgen: Honoraria , Research Funding . Leleu: LeoPharma: Honoraria ; Pierre Fabre: Honoraria ; BMS: Honoraria ; Novartis: Honoraria ; TEVA: Honoraria ; Amgen: Honoraria ; Takeda: Honoraria ; Celgene: Honoraria ; Janssen: Honoraria ; Chugai: Honoraria .

*signifies non-member of ASH