-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

4517 Socio-Demographic Parameters Including Race, As Predictors of Depression in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies

Health Services and Outcomes Research – Malignant Diseases
Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 902. Health Services and Outcomes Research – Malignant Diseases: Poster III
Monday, December 7, 2015, 6:00 PM-8:00 PM
Hall A, Level 2 (Orange County Convention Center)

Amanda Shreders, MD1, Shehzad Niazi, MD2*, David Hodge2*, Nicolette Chimato2*, Megha Kureti2*, Navya Kirla2*, Abhisek Swaika, MBBS3*, Elaine Gustetic2*, Renee Foster2*, Kimberly Nelson2*, Asher Chanan-Khan, MD4 and Sikander Ailawadhi, MD1

1Division of Hematology & Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
2Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
3Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
4Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL

Background: Cancer diagnosis and treatment are important risk factors for developing clinical depression. Validated tools for screening distress and depression, such as Cancer Distress Thermometer (DT) and PHQ9 (Patient Health Questionnaire), are underutilized, despite endorsement by NCCN and Institute of Medicine. We investigated patient and treatment characteristics as well as patient endorsement of depression or anhedonia to predict those at risk of having depression.

Methods:  The PHQ9 and/or DT were administered prospectively to patients with hematologic malignancies (HM) before they started antineoplastic therapy at Mayo Clinic in Florida. Patient endorsement of depression or anhedonia was collected from the current visit information survey. Patient demographics, disease and treatment characteristics, chronic medication burden, Charlson comorbidity index, living situation, clinic/hospital visit burden in the month prior to screening and number of psychiatric medications for every patient were recorded.  Intergroup comparison of categorical and continuous variables was done by Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, respectively. Linear or logistic regression models were used to compare PHQ9 score with DT (continuous) or endorsing depression or anhedonia (categorical) respectively. Multivariate models were constructed using the stepwise selection technique using all potential variables in the models. All analyses were completed using SAS v9.3.

Results: Final analysis included 246 patients with a median age at diagnosis 64.5 (range: 18-94) years, diagnosed between 6/30/93-10/9/14 and screened between 1/13/11-2/13/15. PHQ9 score of ≥9 and DT score ≥5 suggested a high risk of depression and distress, respectively, as per published literature. Patient characteristics at time of survey and analysis are noted in table 1. PHQ9, DT and answers to two questions about depression and anhedonia were available on 129, 129 and 246 patients, respectively. 63% of patients were chemotherapy naïve.  In multivariate analysis, PHQ9 score ≥9 was associated with living alone (p=0.003) (Fig.1a) and non-White race (p=0.043) (Fig.1b), while a DT score ≥5 was associated with being currently married (p=0.048) and female gender (p=0.02). The only characteristic significant on univariate but not on multivariate analysis being chemotherapy naive, associated with a DT score ≥5 (p=0.049). Answering “no” to both the questions regarding depression or anhedonia was significantly associated with a low score on PHQ9 (p=0.007). Age at diagnosis, Charlson comorbidity score, chronic medication or visit burden, daily psychiatric medication use or type of malignancy were not associated with scores on any screen.

Conclusions: Causes of depression in patients with HM have not been fully explored. We validated previously known risk factors for depression, such as living alone. We also reported for the first time that non-White race independently predicts depression in these patients. Female patients and those currently married are at a higher risk of psychological distress, possibly due to fear of abandoning family.  We also found that simply asking a patient two questions about feelings of depression or anhedonia significantly correlates with the well-established PHQ9. Our analysis provides simple tools and reveals at-risk patient subgroups with HM where depression and distress screening should be aggressively instituted for better resource utilization and survivorship.

Table 1:

Patient Characteristic

N

%

Gender

            Male

            Female

146

100

59.4

40.6

Race

            White

            Non-White

216

30

87.8

12.2

Marital Status

            Married

            Not married*

180

66

73.2

26.8

Living Situation

            Alone

            With others

37

209

15

85

Type of Malignancy

            Aggressive lymphoid

            Indolent lymphoid

            Aggressive myeloid

            Indolent myeloid

124

94

25

3

50.4

38.2

10.2

1.2

Prior Cancer Treatment

            Yes

            No

91

155

37

63

Daily Psych Meds

            Yes

            No

52

194

21.1

78.9

Patient Status

            Alive

            Dead

191

55

77.6

22.4

*Not currently married=single, divorced, widowed or unknown

 

Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

*signifies non-member of ASH