Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 612. Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Clinical Studies: Poster I
Aim: The purpose of this study is to assess the outcome of patients with R/R ALL post inotuzumab ozogamicin failure.
Methods: We reviewed 151 patients with R/R ALL treated with inotuzumab ozogamicin as single agent (n=103) or part of a salvage regimen therapy (n=48) between 2009 and 2015. From this cohort of 151, we identified 67 (44%) patients with a median age of 47 years (4-84) who had either not responded to inotuzumab (n=42) or failed after a prior response of 2 months, range (<1 – 29) (n=25) and in whom a follow-up was available. These patients were evaluated for outcome analysis.
Results: Patient characteristics are listed in Table 1. The best prior response to inotuzumab included CR in 7 (10%) patients, CRp in 14 (21%), and CRi in 4 (6%). After a median follow-up of 19 months, (range, 1- 54) from inotuzumab failure, 6 patients (9%) remain alive. The median survival was 4 months, and the estimated 12-month survival rate was 13%. The median survival were 9 months, 3.5 months, and 3.4 months, respectively, for patients who received and failed inotuzumab as first salvage therapy, second salvage therapy, and third or more salvage therapy (P= 0.006). The estimated 12-month survival rates were 29%, 4%, and 10%, respectively. Patients with inotuzumab refractory disease had worse outcome post intozumab failure compared to those who responded and lost their response subsequently; the median overall survival post inotuzumab failure was 3 and 6 months (p=0.01), respectively . Among patients who relapsed, two received subsequent salvage therapy with blinatumomab. One of them responded and achieved a CR for 4 months. Four patients received an allogeneic stem cell transplantation; one of them remain alive at 55+ months.
Conclusion: Outcome after inotuzumab failure is poor with a median survival of 4.4 months; these patients should be referred to clinical trials. Further use of inotuzumab ozogamicin earlier in the course of treatment may further improve the outcome.
Table 1 – Patient Characteristics |
|
|
Characteristics |
n = 67 |
|
|
N |
(%) |
Median age, [range] |
47 [4-84] |
|
Age |
|
|
< 40 |
29 |
(43) |
40-60 |
16 |
(24) |
>60 |
22 |
(33) |
Sex |
|
|
M |
30 |
(45) |
F |
37 |
(55) |
Performance Status |
|
|
0-1 |
59 |
(88) |
2 |
7 |
(10) |
3 |
1 |
(1) |
ALL sub-type |
|
|
Pre-b ALL |
65 |
(97) |
biphenotypic |
2 |
(3) |
Cytogenetics |
|
|
Ph+ |
11 |
(16) |
t(4;11) |
9 |
(13) |
Complex |
13 |
(19) |
Diploid |
8 |
(12) |
Other |
26 |
(39) |
Hematological Parameters |
|
|
Median WBC at start |
4.1 [0.3-48.5] |
|
Median WBC at Fail |
2.3 [0-121.4] |
|
Median PB, blasts at start |
24.5 [0-93] |
|
Median, PB, Blasts at fail |
5.1 [0-96] |
|
Median BM Blasts at start |
75 [13-98] |
|
Median BM Blasts at fail* |
65 [0-99] |
|
Timing of Inotuzumab after Relapse |
|
|
as first salvage therapy |
21 |
(31) |
as second salvage therapy |
27 |
(40) |
as ≥ third salvage therapy |
19 |
(28) |
Number of Inotuzumab cycles |
|
|
1 to 2 cycles |
42 |
(63) |
3 to 4 cycles |
18 |
(27) |
5 to 6 cycles |
7 |
(10) |
* Patients with 0 BM Blast had extramedullary disease |
Disclosures: Chahoud: American Society of Hematology (ASH): Other: 2015 HONORS Award recipient . Off Label Use: Inotuzumab.. Cortes: Novartis: Consultancy , Research Funding ; Pfizer: Consultancy , Research Funding ; BMS: Consultancy , Research Funding ; Teva: Research Funding ; BerGenBio AS: Research Funding ; Ariad: Consultancy , Research Funding ; Astellas: Consultancy , Research Funding ; Ambit: Consultancy , Research Funding ; Arog: Research Funding ; Celator: Research Funding ; Jenssen: Consultancy . Pemmaraju: Stemline: Research Funding ; Incyte: Consultancy , Honoraria ; Novartis: Consultancy , Honoraria , Research Funding ; LFB: Consultancy , Honoraria .
See more of: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Clinical Studies
See more of: Oral and Poster Abstracts
*signifies non-member of ASH