-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

1335 Outcomes of Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) B-Cell Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia (ALL) Post Blinatumomab Failure

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Therapy, excluding Transplantation
Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 614. Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Therapy, excluding Transplantation: Poster I
Saturday, December 5, 2015, 5:30 PM-7:30 PM
Hall A, Level 2 (Orange County Convention Center)

Jenny Dahl, PA1*, Hagop M. Kantarjian, MD2, Musa Yilmaz, MD3*, Tapan Kadia, MD2, Guillermo Garcia-Manero, MD4, Farhad Ravandi, MD2, Gautam Borthakur, MD2, Jorge E. Cortes, MD5, Alessandra Ferrajoli, MD2, Koji Sasaki, MD2, Jad Chahoud, MD1*, Jane Autry, RN1*, Rebecca Garris2* and Elias Jabbour2

1Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
2Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
3Department of Hematology & Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
4Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Houston, TX
5Department of Leukemia, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

 Introduction:  Blinatumomab is a first-in-class Bispecific T-cell engaging (BiTE) antibody targeting CD19-positive malignant cells and CD3-positive T cells.  It has shown activity in both R/R B-cell ALL and with persistent minimal residual disease (MRD).  However, despite a 50% response rate with blinatumomab, the duration of response is very short with many pts experiencing relapse.  The goal of this study is to assess the outcome of patients with R/R B-cell ALL post blinatumomab failure.

Methods: We reviewed 40 patients with R/R ALL treated with blinatumomab at our institution between 1/2012 and 1/2015.  Of the 40 patients treated, 30 were either refractory (n=18) or lost their response (n=12) after initially achieving a complete response or complete response with incomplete count recovery (CRi).  We analyzed the clinical characteristics and survival of these 30 patients who failed blinatumomab.

Results:  Clinical characteristics of the 30 patients with blinatumomab failure are summarized in Table 1. Best response to blinatumomab was CR in 9 pts and CRi in 3 with a median duration of response of 3 months (range, 1-8 months). After a median follow-up of 6.8 months (range 4.8- 31 months) from blinatumomab failure, 8 patients (27%) remain alive. The median overall survival was 6.4 months and the estimated 12-month survival rate was 36%. The median survival was 3 and 11 months for patients refractory to blinatumomab and those who relapsed after a previous response, respectively (p=0.179). Furthermore, there was a trend for better outcome post blinatumomab failure if the drug was administered as first, second, or third and beyond salvage therapy with a median survival of 19, 11, and 5 months, respectively (p= 0.248).   Following blinatumomab failure, 11 patients received inotuzumab ozogamicin salvage therapy as a single agent in 5 or in combination with mini-hyper-CVD in 6 [Jabbour E et al; EHA 2015]. Eight patients responded for an overall response rate of 73% for a median duration of 6 months (range, 1.2 -30 months).   Overall, 9 patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT), 5 of them post salvage therapy with inotuzumab. Seven of them remain alive in CR at the last follow-up. The 1-year survival rates were 83% and 11% for patients who received an allo-SCT and those who did not, respectively (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Overall, the outcome of patients with R/R ALL post blinatumomab failure is poor with a median survival of 6.4 months. Inotuzumab ozogamicin is a good salvage therapy option allowing patients with refractory disease to proceed with allo-SCT that remains the only curative approach for these patients.

 

Table1. Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Blinatumomab Failure N=30

Parameter

N (%)/Median [Range]

Age (years)

29 [19-76]

Sex  (Male)

23 (77)

Performance Status

1 [0-2]

Cytogenetics

   Diploid

9 (30)

   t(4;11)

1 (3)

   Miscellaneous

15 (50)

   t(9;22)

1 (3)

   Insufficient Metaphase

4 (14)

WBC at start (x 109/L)

2.75 [0.4-24]

% PB blasts at start

8 [0-98]

% BM Blasts at start

80 [10-98]

WBC at failure (x 109/L)

3.4 [0-224]

% BM Blasts at failure

69 [2-98]

# Prior therapies, median

3 [1-6]

# Blinatumomab courses

2 [1-5]

Best response to blinatumomab

 

  CR

9 (30)

  CRi

3 (10)

Median duration of response (months)

3 [1-8]

Follow up, median (months)

6.8 [4.8-31]

 

Disclosures: Cortes: Teva: Research Funding ; Novartis: Consultancy , Research Funding ; Pfizer: Consultancy , Research Funding ; BMS: Consultancy , Research Funding ; BerGenBio AS: Research Funding ; Ariad: Consultancy , Research Funding ; Astellas: Consultancy , Research Funding ; Ambit: Consultancy , Research Funding ; Arog: Research Funding ; Celator: Research Funding ; Jenssen: Consultancy .

<< Previous Abstract | Next Abstract

*signifies non-member of ASH