-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

1333 Post-Remission Treatment with Chemotherapy or Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (alloHSCT) of High-Risk (HR) Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative (Ph-neg) Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) According to Minimal Residual Disease (MRD). Preliminary Results of the Pethema ALL-HR-11 TrialClinically Relevant Abstract

Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Therapy, excluding Transplantation
Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 614. Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Therapy, excluding Transplantation: Poster I
Saturday, December 5, 2015, 5:30 PM-7:30 PM
Hall A, Level 2 (Orange County Convention Center)

Josep-Maria Ribera, MD, PhD1, Mireia Morgades, MD1*, Juana Ciudad, MD, PhD2*, Pere Barba, MD, PhD3*, Rodrigo Martino, MD, PhD4, Pau Montesinos, MD, PhD5*, Susana Vives6*, MªJosé Moreno, MD7*, Beatriz Soria, MD8*, Cristina Gil, MD9*, José González-Campos, MD10*, MªLuz Amigo, MD11*, Andrés Novo, MD12*, Mar Tormo, MD, PhD13, Arancha Bermúdez, MD14*, Alfons Serrano, MD15*, Teresa Bernal, MD16*, Aurelio López17*, Juan Bergua18*, Lourdes Escoda, MD, PhD19*, Pilar Martínez, MD20*, Natalia Alonso, MD21*, Santiago Mercadal, MD22*, Eugenia Abella, MD, PhD23*, Ramon Guàrdia, MD, PhD24*, Ferran Vall-llovera, MD25*, Antònia Cladera, MD26*, Jordi Esteve, MD, PhD27, Raimundo García-Boyero, MD28*, Evarist Feliu, MD, PhD29* and Alberto Orfao, MD, PhD2

1Department of Hematology, ICO Badalona-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol. Josep Carreras Leukemia Research Institute. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
2Centro de Investigación del Cáncer (CIC, IBMCC USAL-CSIC), Servicio General de Citometría, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
3Department of Hematology, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
4Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
5Hospital Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
6Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
7Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain
8Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
9Hospital General de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
10Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
11Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain
12Hospital Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
13Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
14Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
15Hospital Madrid Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
16Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
17Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain
18Hospital San Pedro de Alcántara, Cáceres, Spain
19ICO-Hospital Joan XXIII, Tarragona, Spain
20Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
21Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
22ICO-Hospital Duran i Reynals, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
23Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
24ICO- Hospital Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
25Hospital Universitari Mutua Terrassa, Terrassa, Spain
26Hospital Son Llàtzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
27Institute of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Hematology, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
28Hospital Universitario General de Castellón, Castellón de la Plana, Spain
29Hematology Service, ICO-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Institut de Recerca Contra la Leucèmia Josep Carreras, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain

Introduction: Recent studies have shown that young to middle-aged adults who receive a pediatric-inspired chemotherapy regimen for treatment of Ph-neg ALL do not appear to require an alloHSCT if they achieve good response on MRD testing after induction therapy. Patients (pts) who are not good MRD responders achieve better outcomes with alloHSCT than their counterparts who do not receive alloHSCT. However, it is not clear if this approach can be translated to adult ALL pts with HR features at baseline. The aim of the prospective ALL-HR-11 trial from the Spanish PETHEMA Group was to evaluate the response to a differentiated post-induction therapy (chemotherapy or alloHSCT) according to  MRD levels (assessed by 8-color, centrally-performed flow cytometry at the end of induction –week 5- and consolidation therapy –week 17-) in HR Ph-neg adult ALL patients. Patients and methods: HR ALL included one or more of the following parameters at baseline: age 30-60 yr, WBC count >30x109/L for B-cell precursor ALL or >100x109/L for thymic T-ALL, pro-B, early or mature T-ALL, 11q23 or MLL rearrangements or complex karyotype. Induction therapy included vincristine, prednisone, daunorubicin and asparaginase (E coli native or PEG according to center availability) for 4 weeks (Induction-1). FLAG-Ida was administered as intensified induction (Induction-2) in pts not achieving CR or those in CR with MRD≥0.1% at the end of induction. For pts in CR and MRD<0.1% early consolidation therapy included 3 cycles with rotating cytotoxic drugs with high-dose methotrexate, high-dose ARA-C and high-dose asparaginase (E coli native or PEG). These pts continued with delayed consolidation (identical to that of early consolidation) followed by maintenance therapy up to 2 yr. in CR if MRD levels after consolidation were <0.01%, otherwise they were assigned to alloHSCT. Pts in CR after Induction-2 received one consolidation cycle and were assigned to alloHSCT. Results: On June 2015, 115 HR ALL pts were evaluable [mean (SD) age 38(13) yr, 67 males, 80/114 precursor B-ALL, 34/114 T-ALL, WBC count 56(96) x109/L]. Results of Induction-1: therapy-related death: 4(4%), resistance: 11 (10%), CR: 95(86%). MRD<0.1% at the end of induction was observed in 75% of CR patients. Induction-2 was administered to 33 patients (no CR: 11, CR and MRD≥0.1%: 22). No differences in the CR rate or in the rate of MRD clearance after induction were observed according to the type of asparaginase administered, although significantly increased hepatic toxicity in consolidation was observed in patients treated with PEG-asparaginase. The 2-yr DFS and OS probabilities for whole series were 51%±18% and 62%±13%. By intention-to treat after Induction-1 36 pts were assigned to alloHSCT and 68 to delayed consolidation and maintenance. The 2-yr DFS and OS probabilities were 54%±25% and 49%±20%, respectively, for pts assigned to alloHSCT, and 50%±22% and 73%±17%, respectively, for those assigned to chemotherapy (P=0.002 for OS comparison). Patients with MRD<0.1% at the end of induction and <0.01% at the end of consolidation (n=51) showed a 2-yr DFS and OS of 55%±25% and 81%±18%, respectively. Conclusions: The preliminary results of this trial, in which the post-induction therapy decision is only based on MRD results, suggest that in HR, Ph-neg adult ALL pts with adequate MRD response after induction and after consolidation the results of therapy are not hampered by avoiding alloHSCT. Supported by grants RD12/0036/0029 (RTICC, FEDER), PI14/01971 FIS, Instituto Carlos III, and SGR225 (GRE), Spain

Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

*signifies non-member of ASH