-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

893 A Prospective Cohort Study of Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis

Antithrombotic Therapy
Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Type: Oral
Session: 332. Antithrombotic Therapy II
Monday, December 7, 2015: 7:15 PM
W307, Level 3 (Orange County Convention Center)

Alejandro Lazo-Langner, MD, MSc1, Susan R Kahn, MD, MSc2, Philip S Wells, MD, MSc3, David Anderson, MD4, Marc Rodger, MD, MSc5, Marc Carrier, MD, MSc3, Annmarie A. Bosco, MBBS, BSc (Med)6*, Judy Kovacs, RN7*, Roweena Corpuz, RN7* and Michael J. Kovacs, MD, FRCPC8

1Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Western University - London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
2Center for Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
3Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
4Dalhousie Unv. and Capital District, Halifax, NS, Canada
5Department of Hematology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
6Department of Haematology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia
7London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
8Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada

Introduction. Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) is a relatively uncommon event with potentially serious complications. Its optimal treatment and clinical outcomes are not well studied. The objective of our study was to assess the safety and efficacy of a standardized management protocol for UEDVT as well as its long term complications. 

Patients and methods. We conducted a prospective cohort study at 5 Canadian centres and enrolled adult patients with a symptomatic UEDVT confirmed by compression ultrasound involving the brachial or more proximal veins, with or without a pulmonary embolism (PE). Exclusions included pregnancy, dialysis catheter thrombosis, active or high bleeding risk, platelet count <100x109/L, creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min, on warfarin for other indications, hemodynamically unstable PE, acute leukemia or undergoing a stem cell transplant within 3 months, geographical inaccessibility, life expectancy <3 months or treatment with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or warfarin for more than 7 days since diagnosis. Standardized treatment regimens were as follows: spontaneous or central venous catheter (CVC)-related UEDVT were treated with dalteparin at therapeutic doses for at least 5 days followed by warfarin adjusted according to INR results. Spontaneous UEDVT was treated for at least 6 months and CVC-related events were treated for at least 3 months or for as long as the line remained in place and for at least 1 month after line removal. Cancer patients with non CVC-related UEDVT were treated using dalteparin alone for a minimum of 6 months. Main outcomes were objectively documented venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence, major bleeding and death. All outcomes were centrally adjudicated. Patients were followed for 2 years. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Survival data was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier Method. Post-hoc analyses were conducted comparing CVC and spontaneous events. The study was approved by all institutional review boards.

Results. Between 2009 and 2012, we enrolled 141 patients: 75 with spontaneous and 66 with CVC related UEDVT. Mean age was 51 years; 55% were males. The population characteristics are shown in the Table. The 2 year cumulative incidence of VTE recurrence was 3.5% (95% CI 1.5-8), of major bleeding was 2.8% (95% CI 1.1-7.1) and of death was 22% (95% CI 16-29.5). VTE recurrence rate was no different for spontaneous vs. CVC-related groups (4% vs. 3%; Log-Rank P = 0.690; Figure).

Conclusion. The use of a standardized management protocol for patients with UEDVT results in a low risk of VTE recurrence and major bleeding at 2 years of follow up, in both CVC-related and spontaneous UEDVT.

 

Table 1. Population characteristics

 

Spontaneous UEDVT

Catheter-related UEDVT

Total

P-value

 

N

%

N

%

N

%

 

Demographics

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Age (Mean [SD])

48.6

[17.8]

54.9

[13.6]

51.6

[16.2]

 NS

Male gender

44

58.7

34

51.5

78

55.3

 NS

Caucasian

67

89.3

64

97.0

131

92.9

 NS

Comorbidities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Previous VTE

3

4.0

2

3.0

5

3.5

NS

Prior or concurrent cancer

22

29.3

48

72.7

70

49.6

<0.001

Prior gastrointestinal Bleeding

6

8.0

5

7.6

11

7.8

NS

Type of Catheter

 

 

 

 

 

 

NE

    Hickman

-

-

1

1.5

1

0.7

 

    PICC

-

-

49

74.2

49

34.8

 

    Porta Cath

-

-

16

24.2

16

11.3

 

Thrombus Location

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Subclavian

54

72.0

43

65.2

97

68.8

 NS

    Superior vena cava

0

0.0

2

3.0

2

1.4

 NS

    Brachiocephalic

5

6.7

10

15.2

15

10.6

 NS

    Internal Jugular

16

21.3

14

21.2

30

21.3

 NS

    Axillary

39

52.0

34

51.5

73

51.8

 NS

    External Jugular

1

1.3

2

3.0

3

2.1

 NS

Treatment Duration

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    3 Months

26

34.7

19

28.8

45

31.9

<0.001

    6 Months

37

49.3

4

6.1

41

29.1

0.000

    Other

12

16.0

43

65.2

55

39.0

0.000

Figure. Kaplan-Meier survival curve for VTE recurrence

Disclosures: Lazo-Langner: Bayer: Honoraria ; Pfizer: Honoraria . Wells: Bayer: Honoraria ; BMS/Pfizer: Research Funding . Carrier: BMS: Research Funding ; Bayer: Consultancy ; Pfizer: Consultancy ; LEO Pharma: Consultancy , Research Funding . Kovacs: Bayer: Honoraria , Research Funding ; LEO Pharma: Honoraria ; Daiichi Sankyo Pharma: Research Funding ; Pfizer: Honoraria , Research Funding .

*signifies non-member of ASH