Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Type: Oral
Session: 623. Lymphoma: Chemotherapy, excluding Pre-Clinical Models: DLBCL – Beyond R-CHOP
Methods: In this international, multicenter phase II trial (PTLD-1, 3rd amendment; NCT00590447), treatment-naïve adult solid organ transplant recipients diagnosed with CD20-positive PTLD were treated with rituximab (375 mg/m2 IV) on days 1, 8, 15 and 22. After restaging, patients in CR continued with four three-weekly courses of rituximab monotherapy while all others received 4 cycles of R-CHOP-21 + G-CSF. In case of disease progression during rituximab monotherapy R-CHOP was commenced immediately. The primary endpoint was treatment efficacy measured as response rates and response duration. Analysis was by intention to treat. This is the final analysis of 152 patients treated with RSST from 2007 to 2014 at centers in Germany (72), Belgium (36), France (24), Australia (7), Poland (7) and Italy (6) with a median follow-up of 4.5 years. The 70 patients treated with rituximab followed by CHOP-21 in the original PTLD-1 trial (median follow-up 5.1 years) served as a control population. Inclusion criteria and follow-up schedule were identical; there were no significant differences in the transplant- and lymphoma-related baseline factors listed below.
Results: 115/152 patients were male. 69/152 were kidney, 40 liver, 18 lung, 15 heart, 5 heart/kidney, 3 kidney/pancreas and 2 heart/lung transplant recipients. Median age at diagnosis was 56 years. PTLD was late (> 1 year after transplantation) in 120/152 (79%) of patients. 67/145 (46%) PTLD were EBV-associated. 130/152 patients had monomorphic, 20 polymorphic and 2 early lesion PTLD. The overall response rate (ORR) was 111/126 (88%, CR: 88/126 [70%]). Median duration of remission (DR) was not reached; the 3-year Kaplan-Meier estimate was 82% (compared to 71% in PTLD-1). In the intention-to-treat population (152 patients), the median time to progression (TTP) was not reached either. The 3-year Kaplan-Meier estimate was 78% (69% in PTLD-1). Median OS by intention-to-treat was 6.6 years (95% CI 5.5 – 7.6) with a 3-year estimate of 70% in comparison to 61% in PTLD-1. There was no significant difference in ORR, DR, TTP or OS between EBV-positive and EBV-negative PTLD. On the other hand, response to 4 applications of rituximab was a highly significant predictor of OS, TTP and progression-free survival (PFS) despite treatment stratification (all p<0.001).
37/148 patients (25%) achieved CR with 4 cycles of rituximab and were allocated to rituximab consolidation. In this group, TTP in the intention-to-treat population was significantly longer than in the corresponding group in the PTLD-1 trial (37 patients versus 14 patients, p<0.05). In the 111 patients allocated to R-CHOP consolidation, ORR was 78/92 (85%) with 55/92 (60%) complete remissions (89% and 60%, respectively, in PTLD-1). Median TTP was not reached, the 3-year estimate was 73% (69% in PTLD-1). In patients refractory to rituximab induction, the CR rate was 22/38 (58%) with R-CHOP compared to 3/11 (27%) in PTLD-1 with CHOP (p=0.07); median PFS was 1.4 years versus 0.3 years in PTLD-1, p<0.05. The frequency of grade 3/4 leukopenia and infections was 63% and 34%, respectively. Treatment-related mortality occurred in 7%.
Conclusions: This largest trial cohort in PTLD to date demonstrates for the first time that treatment stratification by response to rituximab induction is feasible, safe and effective. Rituximab consolidation in early rituximab responders results in significantly better disease control compared to CHOP consolidation. The addition of rituximab to CHOP chemotherapy improves outcome in patients refractory to rituximab monotherapy.
Disclosures: Trappe: Mundipharma: Research Funding ; AbbVie: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees ; Roche: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees , Research Funding , Speakers Bureau ; Amgen: Research Funding , Speakers Bureau ; CSL Behring: Research Funding , Speakers Bureau . Zimmermann: Roche: Honoraria ; Celgene: Other: Travel support . Morschhauser: Genentech Inc./Roche: Other: Advisory boards . Mollee: Celgene: Honoraria , Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees , Research Funding , Speakers Bureau ; Janssen: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees , Research Funding , Speakers Bureau ; Onyx: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees , Speakers Bureau . Zaucha: Roche: Honoraria , Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees , Speakers Bureau ; Servier: Honoraria , Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees , Speakers Bureau ; Gilead: Honoraria , Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees , Speakers Bureau ; Amgen: Speakers Bureau ; Takeda: Speakers Bureau . Dührsen: Roche: Honoraria , Research Funding ; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria , Research Funding ; Amgen: Honoraria , Research Funding . Hüttmann: Amgen: Research Funding ; Roche: Research Funding . Salles: Calistoga Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Celgene Corporation; Genentech, Inc.; Janssen Pharmaceutica Products, L.P.; Roche: Consultancy ; Celgene Corporation; Roche and Gilead Sciences: Research Funding ; Celgene Corporation; Roche: Speakers Bureau . Kliem: Astellas: Honoraria ; Fresenius: Honoraria ; Genzyme: Honoraria ; Novartis: Honoraria ; Roche: Honoraria ; Raptor: Honoraria . Van Den Neste: Roche: Other: Travel ; Janssen: Consultancy . Leblond: Roche: Consultancy , Honoraria , Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses , Speakers Bureau ; Gilead: Consultancy , Honoraria , Speakers Bureau ; Mundipharma: Honoraria ; Janssen: Consultancy , Honoraria , Speakers Bureau ; GSK: Consultancy , Honoraria , Speakers Bureau . Choquet: Janssen: Consultancy ; Roche: Consultancy .
See more of: Lymphoma: Chemotherapy, excluding Pre-Clinical Models
See more of: Oral and Poster Abstracts
*signifies non-member of ASH