-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

2010 Disease Risk Index Is the Major Predictor of Outcome Following Myeloablative Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (haplo-HSCT) and Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide (PT/Cy)

Clinical Allogeneic Transplantation: Results
Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 732. Clinical Allogeneic Transplantation: Results: Poster I
Saturday, December 5, 2015, 5:30 PM-7:30 PM
Hall A, Level 2 (Orange County Convention Center)

Scott R. Solomon, MD1, Connie Sizemore1*, Xu Zhang, PhD2*, Melhem Solh, MD1, Lawrence E. Morris, MD1, H. Kent Holland, MD1 and Asad Bashey, MD, PhD1

1The Blood and Marrow Transplant Program at Northside Hospital, Atlanta, GA
2Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA

Disease Risk Index is the Major Predictor of Outcome Following Myeloablative Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (haplo-HSCT) and Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide (PT/Cy)

Although non-myeloablative (NMA) haplo-HSCT utilizing PT/Cy results in low rates of GVHD, infection, and non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse remains the predominant cause of treatment failure, occurring in up to 50% of patients. To reduce the risk of relapse often associated with the use of NMA preparative regimens, we have developed a myeloablative haplo-HSCT utilizing PT/Cy.  Sixty-four patients have been transplanted following either Busulfan-based (n=20) or TBI-based (n=44) myeloablative conditioning, T-cell replete PBSC infusion, PT/Cy, and tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil.  Median age was 43 (range 21-60).  Patient characteristics included a high/very high disease risk by the Dana-Farber/CIBMTR disease risk index (DRI) in 32 patients (50%), KPS<90 in 69%, and comorbidity index (CMI) of ≥2 in 58% of patients.  The most common indications for transplant were AML, ALL, and advanced-phase CML in 55%, 20% and 12% of patients respectively.  Median follow-up for surviving patients was 24 months.  All patients have engrafted with no late graft failure.  Grade II-IV, III-IV acute GVHD and moderate-severe chronic GVHD occurred in 46%, 23%, and 30% respectively.  One-year NRM was 10%.  Predicted three-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and relapse are 53%, 53%, and 26% respectively.  In multivariate analysis, high/very high DRI was the most significant negative predictor of OS (HR 13.26, p<0.001), followed by CMI≥2 (HR 3.54, p=0.01) and age (HR 1.26, p=0.038, per each 5 year increase in age).  DRI was also significantly associated with DFS (HR 10.84, p<0.001), NRM (HR 15.0, p=0.004), and relapse (HR 8.85, p=0.004). In the 32 patients with standard risk disease (low/intermediate DRI), outcomes were significantly improved with one-year NRM of 0% and predicted 3-year OS, DFS, and relapse of 79%, 74% and 9% respectively.  Conditioning regimen (TBI vs. Busulfan) had no significant impact on outcome.  This analysis confirms that DRI is a strong predictor of outcome following myeloablative haplo-HSCT and PT/Cy and adds to a growing body of literature suggesting that haplo-HSCT is a safe and effective transplant option for patients lacking a matched sibling donor.

Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

*signifies non-member of ASH