-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

1719 SLP76 Is Ectopically Expressed in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Cells and Involves in B-Cell Receptor  Signaling

CLL: Biology and Pathophysiology, excluding Therapy
Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 641. CLL: Biology and Pathophysiology, excluding Therapy: Poster I
Saturday, December 5, 2015, 5:30 PM-7:30 PM
Hall A, Level 2 (Orange County Convention Center)

Yair Herishanu, MD1,2, Nili Dorozella3*, Mika Shapiro, Ph.D.3*, Chava Perry, MD/Ph.D.1* and Ben-Zion Katz, Ph.D.3,4*

1Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
2Hematology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
3Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Department of Hematology, Tel-Aviv, Israel
4Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

In the last decade, the B-cell receptor (BCR) has emerged as a pivotal stimulus in CLL pathogenesis. The BCR responsiveness in CLL cells is heterogeneous among patients and correlates with disease aggressiveness. Here we show for the first time, that SLP76 a key scaffold protein in T-cell receptor (TCR) signaling, is ectopically expressed in CD19+ purified CLL cells (purity >95%) in the majority of patients, and is co-expressed with other components of the TCR pathway, including LCK and ZAP70.  SLP76 mRNA levels correlated with its protein expression and SLP76 protein levels were higher in unmutated IGHV and ZAP70+ CLL cells. SLP76 was found to be functionally active in CLL cells, as it becomes phosphorylated in response to BCR engagement in a time dependent manner. Activation with anti-IgM antibody results in phosphorylation of SLP76 on the positive regulatory tyrosine residue Y128 residue with increased physical association with Btk, peaking after 15 minutes. The negative regulatory residue S376 became phosphorylated only after 45', concomitantly with downregulation of the tyrosine phosphorylation. SLP76 phosphorylation in response to BCR engagement did not correlate with total ZAP70 expression. Pre-incubation of CLL cells with the LCK kinase inhibitor LCKi and with the SYK inhibitor R406, inhibited SLP76 phosphorylation in response to BCR activation, while the BTK inhibitor-ibrutinib had no effect. These suggest that LCK and SYK, but not ZAP70, play a central role in the upstream signaling involved in SLP76 activation in CLL cells.  Knockdown of SLP76 in CLL cells resulted in decreased induction of BTK and PLCγ2 phosphorylation after BCR activation with anti-IgM.  Consistent with our findings that SLP76 in involved in BCR signaling in CLL cells, we found that high total SLP76 expression was associated with a shorter time to first progression or need for treatment. In conclusion, SLP76 is ectopically expressed in CLL cells and plays a role in BCR signaling in those cells.

Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

*signifies non-member of ASH