Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 622. Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Biology, excluding Therapy: Poster III
Methods: [18F]-Fludarabine was produced according to a method already described (Guillouet et al, Mol Imaging Biol 2014,16:28-35). [18F]-Fludarabine PET/CT (Discovery RX VCT 64, GE Healthcare) was performed in 5 histologically confirmed and treatment naïve DLBCL patients (65 ± 8 years old). Successive partial body PET scans (skull vertex to mid-thigh) were acquired for 250 min after intravenous injection of [18F]-fludarabine with an activity of 4MBq/kg. PET images were analyzed drawing VOIs over the uptake sites on a late scan and projected onto all co-registered scans of the same subject. The intensity of tracer uptake was evaluated with standardized uptake value (SUVmax). The performance of [18F]fludarabine PET/CT was visually compared with conventional assessments (high-resolution CT) and [18F]-FDG PET.
Results: CT and [18F]-FDG PET staging of the 5 patients was I to IV. No adverse event was recorded during and after the procedure. In all 5 patients, the uptake of [18F]-fludarabine coincides with sites expected to be involved following conventional staging. SUVmax were significantly higher in involved sites in comparison with non-lymphoma sites (Figure 1). As previously demonstrated in an animal model, we found no uptake in the cardiac muscle and brain in contrast to [18F]-FDG PET. Bone marrow was histologically normal in the 5 patients and [18F]-fludarabine PET displayed no hypermetabolism. A progressive splenic uptake (x4 to x8 at 250 min) was observed in every patient. The possibility of an unexpected splenic infiltration appears to be a better explanation than uptake by physiologically normal lymphoid tissue. Comparison of [18F]-FDG and [18F]-fludarabine PET showed discrepancies in 2 patients. The first had bilateral hilar [18F]-FDG uptakes (Figure 1C), not present in [18F]-fludarabine PET, which persisted on [18F]-FDG PET after completion of the treatment and disappearance of all suspected pathological sites. This pattern suggests a non-specific [18F]-FDG hypermetabolism. The second patient had a right testis positive [18F]-FDG PET, not evident with [18F]-fludarabine PET. Histology of the testis confirmed the presence of NHL. The interpretation of this would require further extensive data.
Conclusion: [18F]-Fludarabine PET/CT appears to be a promising tool to diagnose discordance and follow-up NHL. These preliminary results showed a clear specificity of this novel radiotracer for lymphoma tissues and support the development of this innovative biomarker for lymphoproliferative diseases. Studies for a more detailed comparison with [18F]-FDG PET are in progress.
Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
See more of: Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Biology, excluding Therapy
See more of: Oral and Poster Abstracts
*signifies non-member of ASH