-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

3105 Sequential Intensified Conditioning Regimen Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Adult Patients with High-Risk AML in Complete Remission: A Survey from the ALWP of the EBMT

Clinical Allogeneic Transplantation: Conditioning Regimens, Engraftment and Acute Transplant Toxicities
Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 721. Clinical Allogeneic Transplantation: Conditioning Regimens, Engraftment and Acute Transplant Toxicities: Poster II
Sunday, December 6, 2015, 6:00 PM-8:00 PM
Hall A, Level 2 (Orange County Convention Center)

Florent Malard, MD, PhD1*, Myriam Labopin, MD2*, Gernot Stuhler, MD3*, Johanna Tischer, MD4*, Joerg Thomas Bittenbring, MD,5*, Arnold Ganser, M.D.6, Nicolaus Kroeger, MD7, Donald Bunjes, MD8*, Christoph Schmid, MD9, Jiri Mayer10, Mauricette Michallet, MD, PhD11, Michael Hallek, MD12, Bipin N. Savani, MD13, Mohamad Mohty, MD, PhD14 and Arnon Nagler, MD, MSc15

1Hematology Department, CHU, Nantes, France
2Department of Hematology and Cell Therapy, Saint Antoine Hospital, Paris, France
3Zentrum für Blutstammzell- und Knochenmarktransplantation, DKD Helios Klinik Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
4Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital of Munich-Grosshadern, Department of Internal Medicine III, Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Munich, Germany
5Department of Internal Medicine I, Saarland University Medical School, Homburg, Germany
6Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
7Center of Oncology - Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
8Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
9Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Germany, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
10Department of Internal Medicine - Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
11Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France
12Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
13Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
14Hematology, Hospital Saint-Antoine, Paris University UPMC, INSERM U938, Paris, France
15Chaim Sheba Medical center and EBMT Acute Leukemia Working Party, Tel-Hashomer and Paris, Israel

Introduction. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) is an established treatment modality that is potentially curative for many patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The development of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) allows performing HCT in elderly and/or in heavily pretreated patients and in those with comorbidities precluding the use of standard myeloablative conditioning. Post-transplant relapse remains a challenge after RIC, particularly in patients with adverse prognosis factors. The so-called “sequential” transplant approach (e.g. FLAMSA regimen combining both intensive chemotherapy and RIC HCT within the same procedure) initially developed in patients with refractory AML, could be a promising strategy to improve disease control and decrease the risk of relapse in high-risk AML patients in complete remission (CR).

Patients and methods. In the current study we analyzed transplantation outcomes in a cohort of 411 adults AML patients in CR at time of transplant, treated between 2002 and 2013. Patients received a “sequential” conditioning regimen based on Fludarabine 30 mg/m2/d, high-dose aracytine 1-2 g/m2/d, amsacrine 100 mg/m2/d for 5 days and after a 3 days rest, total body irradiation (TBI) 4Gy, cyclophosphamide 50-120 mg/kg, and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) for 2 to 3 days (TBI group, n=269 [65%]). In 142 (35%) patients, TBI was substituted by IV Busulfan 3.2 mg/kg/d for 2 days, or orally equivalent dose (Bu group). 323 patients (79%) had de-novo AML and 88 (21%) had a secondary AML (with prior myelodysplastic syndrome). At time of transplant, 300 (73%) patients were in CR1 and 111 (27%) in CR2. Cytogenetic study in de novo AML was favorable in 19 patients (6%), intermediate in 102 (32%) and poor in 41 (13%). Cytogenetic data were missing in 161 (50%). 104 (25%) patients received matched related donors (MRD) and 307 (75%) unrelated donor (URD) HCT. Majority of patients (94%) received mobilized peripheral blood stem cells graft.

Results. Median follow-up of surviving patients was 28 months and median age at transplant was 54 years (18-76). ANC>500/μL was achieved at a median of 17 (range, 9–74) days after HCT. Sixteen patients (4%) failed to engraft. Two year cumulative incidence of relapse (RI) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 22% (95%CI, 18–26%) and 22% (95%CI, 18–27%), respectively. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) at 2 years were 59% (95%CI, 54–65%) and 56% (95%CI, 50–61%), respectively. Acute GVHD (grade II-IV) occurred in 109 (28%) patients. The 2-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD was 31% (95%CI, 26-36), extensive in 17% (95%CI, 12-21). Two years RI, NRM, LFS and OS in TBI vs. Bu patients were 21.8% vs 21.7% (p=0.69), 29.4% vs 18.3% (p=0.008), 48.8% vs 59.6% (p=0.045) and 51.2% vs 64.0% (p=0.013), respectively. In multivariate analysis adjusted for variable with different distribution between Bu and TBI groups, the type of conditioning (TBI vs Bu) has no impact on RI, NRM, LFS and OS. Age over 55 at transplant was an independent adverse prognostic factor in multivariate analysis for NRM (hazard ratio (HR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.00-2.61, p=0.05)), LFS (HR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.00-1.92, p=0.05) and OS (HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.11-2.18, p=0.01). Being treated in an experienced center (defined as having including 10 or more transplants in the study) was associated with a significant lower RI (HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.75-0.93, p=0.001) and better LFS (HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.84-0.98, p=0.01) and OS (HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.84-0.98, p=0.02). Finally, transplantation from an URD was associated with a significant increase in NRM (HR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.14-3.91, p=0.02). Of note, CR1 vs. CR2 and de novo vs. secondary AML had no impact on patients’ outcome. 

Conclusions. These results in a rather large cohort of patients with AML suggest that a FLAMSA “sequential” regimen provided an efficient disease control in high-risk AML patients including in CR2 and secondary AML. Furthermore Busulfan and TBI based FLAMSA “sequential” regimens provide a similar outcome. These results should be confirmed in a multicenter well design randomized study.

Disclosures: Off Label Use: off-label drug use: antithymocyte globulin (ATG) for allo-SCT conditioning. Tischer: Sanofi-Aventis: Other: advisory board . Schmid: Neovii: Consultancy ; Janssen Cilag: Other: Travel grand . Mayer: Cell Therapeutics: Other: Grants, personal fees . Hallek: GSK, Genentech: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees , Research Funding ; Mundipharma: Honoraria , Other: Speakers Bureau and/or Advisory Boards , Research Funding ; Boehringher Ingelheim: Honoraria , Other: Speakers Bureau and/or Advisory Boards ; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria , Other: Speakers Bureau and/or Advisory Boards , Research Funding ; Celgene: Honoraria , Other: Speakers Bureau and/or Advisory Boards , Research Funding ; Gilead: Honoraria , Other: Speakers Bureau and/or Advisory Boards , Research Funding ; Roche: Honoraria , Other: Speakers Bureau and/or Advisory Boards , Research Funding ; Janssen: Honoraria , Other: Speakers Bureau and/or Advisory Boards , Research Funding ; AbbVie: Honoraria , Other: Speakers Bureau and/or Advisory Boards , Research Funding .

*signifies non-member of ASH