Clinical Allogeneic Transplantation: Results
Oral and Poster Abstracts
732. Clinical Allogeneic Transplantation: Results: Poster I
Hall A, Level 2
(Orange County Convention Center)
Claudio G Brunstein, MD1, Corey S Cutler, MD, MPH2, Todd E. DeFor, MS3*, Thomas R. Spitzer, MD4, Nelli Bejanyan, MD1, Alfred L. Garfall, MD5, Michael R. Verneris, MD3, Yi-Bin Chen, MD6, Erica Warlick, MD7, Haesook T. Kim, PhD8*, Jeffrey S. Miller, MD1, Joseph H. Antin, MD9, Daniel J. Weisdorf, MD10*, Robert J Soiffer, MD11, John E Wagner, MD12 and Karen K. Ballen, MD6
1Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
2Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
3Adult and Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
4Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
5Lymphoma Program, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
6Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
7University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
8Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
9Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General, Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
10Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
11Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
12Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Matching at HLA-C has been shown to influence outcomes and has been incorporated in selection of unrelated adult donors. In contrast, selection of UCB grafts has historically considered HLA-A and B at antigen and DRB1 at allele level resolution. Recent data in single, myeloablative pediatric UCB transplantation demonstrated that antigen level matching at HLA-C was associated with lower NRM and improved survival in patients receiving better HLA-matched units. Whether or not these same principles apply in the setting of double UCB (dUCB) transplantation has not been addressed. Thus, we retrospectively studied whether HLA-C matching would influence outcomes in 490 patients with hematological malignancies at two centers undergoing myeloablative and reduced intensity dUCB transplantation. We considered the worst HLA-matching of the 2 donor units with 316 (64%) patients receiving at least one 4/6 matched unit and 144 (29%) one or two 5/6 units, and 30 (6%) receiving two 6/6 HLA-matched units. Patients were scored considering the number of HLA-C antigen matches as 0-1 (23%), 2 (40%), 3 (18%), and 4 (19%), of 4 possible matches. The median age was 47 yrs. (range, 2-72), 59% were male, 285 (58%) had acute leukemia, 291 (59%) were CMV seropositive, 319 (66%) received RIC regimen, and 400 (82%) had CsA/MMF immunosuppression. In the overall study population, we observed no significant influence of HLA-C matching on the risk of death, treatment failure, non-relapse death, relapse, GVHD and hematopoietic recovery. However, we recognized an interaction between conventional HLA-matching at A, B, and DRB1 and number of matches at HLA-C in the survival endpoints. Thus, we analyzed two groups based on conventional HLA-matching at A, B and DRB1: those receiving at least one 4/6 HLA-matched unit (4/6 & 4-6/6; n=316) or those receiving ≥ 5-6/6 matched unit (5/6 & 5-6/6; n=174). In the ≥5/6 UCB transplants, there was no significant influence of HLA-C matching on the risk of death, treatment failure, non-relapse death, and relapse. However, in 4/6 & 4-6/6 transplants, better matching at HLA-C was associated with lower risk of death, treatment failure, and non-relapse death (Table), but there remained no association with risk of relapse. These data contrast with those reported with single UCB grafts and suggest that with 4/6 HLA-matched UCB units, additional matching at HLA-C reduces treatment failure and improves survival, and should be included in the match strategy. In better matched (≥5/6) dUCB grafts further matching at HLA-C offers no additional benefit.
Table shows multivariate analysis results in 316 patient who received 4/6 & 4-6/6 dUCB grafts
|
Matching at HLA C
|
N
|
Overall mortality
|
Treatment failure
|
Non-relapse death
|
Relapse
|
Grade II-IV acute GVHD
|
Relative Risk (95% CI)
|
P
|
Relative Risk (95% CI)
|
P
|
Relative Risk (95% CI)
|
P
|
Relative Risk (95% CI)
|
P
|
Relative Risk (95% CI)
|
P
|
4/4
|
33
|
1.0
|
|
1.0
|
|
1.0
|
|
1.0
|
|
1.0
|
|
3/4
|
52
|
1.7
|
0.12
|
1.5
|
0.16
|
3.0
|
0.10
|
0.9
|
0.78
|
1.1
|
0.83
|
|
|
(0.8-3.5)
|
|
(0.8-2.8)
|
|
(0.8-10.9)
|
|
(0.4-1.9)
|
|
(0.4-3.2)
|
|
2/4
|
136
|
2.3
|
0.01
|
1.7
|
0.06
|
5.4
|
<0.01
|
0.6
|
0.15
|
1.1
|
0.85
|
|
|
(1.2-4.2)
|
|
(1.0-2.9)
|
|
(1.7-17.7)
|
|
(0.3-1.2)
|
|
(0.4-3.0)
|
|
0-1/4
|
95
|
2.3
|
0.01
|
1.8
|
0.03
|
4.4
|
0.02
|
0.9
|
0.71
|
1.1
|
0.86
|
|
|
(1.3-4.4)
|
|
(1.1-3.2)
|
|
(1.3-14.4)
|
|
(0.5-1.7)
|
|
(0.4-3.0)
|
|
Disclosures: Chen: Regimmune:
Research Funding
. Miller: Coronado:
Speakers Bureau
; BioSciences:
Speakers Bureau
; Celegene:
Speakers Bureau
. Antin: Gentium SpA/Jazz Pharmaceuticals:
Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees
.
*signifies non-member of ASH