-Author name in bold denotes the presenting author
-Asterisk * with author name denotes a Non-ASH member
Clinically Relevant Abstract denotes an abstract that is clinically relevant.

PhD Trainee denotes that this is a recommended PHD Trainee Session.

Ticketed Session denotes that this is a ticketed session.

1190 Ex Vivo Mesenchymal Precursor Cell-Expanded Cord Blood Transplantation Following Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimens

Hematopoiesis and Stem Cells: Microenvironment, Cell Adhesion and Stromal Stem Cells
Program: Oral and Poster Abstracts
Session: 506. Hematopoiesis and Stem Cells: Microenvironment, Cell Adhesion and Stromal Stem Cells: Poster I
Saturday, December 5, 2015, 5:30 PM-7:30 PM
Hall A, Level 2 (Orange County Convention Center)

Rohtesh S. Mehta, MD, MPH, MS1, Rima M Saliba, Ph.D2*, Kai Cao, MS, MD3*, Indreshpal Kaur, PhD4*, Katayoun Rezvani, M.D., PhD2, Julianne Chen2*, Amanda Olson5*, Simrit Parmar, MD2, Nina Shah, MD2, David Marin, MD, DM, MSc2*, Amin M. Alousi, MD2, Chitra Hosing, MD2, Uday R. Popat, M.D.2, Partow Kebriaei, MD2, Richard E. Champlin, MD2, Ian K. McNiece, PhD6, Marcos De Lima, MD7, Donna Skerrett8*, Elizabeth Burke8*, Elizabeth J. Shpall, MD2 and Betul Oran, MD2

1Hematology Oncology Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
2Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
3Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
4The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
5Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
6The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
7Hematology and Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland
8Mesoblast Ltd, Melbourne, Australia

Introduction: Double-unit cord blood (CB) transplantation (DCBT) after myeloablative conditioning, where one CB unit is expanded ex-vivo with mesenchymal precursor cells (MPC)-co-culture led to significantly improved neutrophil and platelet engraftment compared to historical controls.1 Our aim was to determine the efficacy of this technique after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens.

Methods: We evaluated consecutive adult patients with hematological malignancies who received RIC regimens followed by DCBT where one unit was infused unmanipulated and second unit was expanded ex-vivo with MPC prior to infusion (“MPC group” n=27), as described previously,1 and compared them with historical cohort who  received two unmanipulated CB units (“controls” n= 51) from 2003-2015. Two RIC regimens were used - Flu/Cy/TBI (flu 40 mg/m2, cy 50 mg/kg and TBI 200cGy) (n=40) and Flu/Mel (flu 40 mg/m2 and mel 140 mg/m2) (n=38) with rabbit ATG 3mg/kg. Tacrolimus and MMF were used for GVHD prophylaxis. Primary endpoint was median time to engraftment of neutrophils (≥ 0.5 X 109 /L X 3 consecutive days) and platelets (≥ 20 X 109/L X 7 consecutive days without transfusion).

Results: Diagnoses were AML/MDS (N=38; 49%), ALL (N=13; 17%), NHL (N=18; 23%), HD (N=3; 4%), CML (N=1; 1%), and CLL (N=4; 5%). Baseline patient characteristics were similar among the groups [Table 1]. Majority of CB units (66%) were 5-6/8 matched at HLA-A, B, C and DRB1 by high resolution testing. Infused median total nucleated cells (TNC) (x107/Kg) were 4 and 8, and median CD34 cells (x105/Kg) were 4.3 and 19.7, respectively for control and MPC groups. Co-culture with MPCs led to expansion of TNC by a median of 11.1 and of CD34+ cells by a median of 49.3.

Among engrafted patients, median time to neutrophil engraftment was 12 (range 1-28) days in MPC group as compared with 16 (range 5-48) days in controls (p=0.02); the median time to platelet engraftment was 31 days and 37 days, respectively (P=0.3). On day 26, the cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment was 78% in MPC group versus 67% in controls (P=0.1). On day 60, the cumulative incidence of platelet engraftment was 74% and 74%, respectively (P=0.7). [Figure 1]

Conditioning regimen also affected the time to neutrophil recovery. Among patients with Flu/Mel, the median time to neutrophil engraftment was 14 days in MPC-group (n=13) compared with 22 days in controls (n=19) (p=0.001). Patients with Flu/Cy/TBI regimen had faster time to engraftment; median time to neutrophil engraftment was 6 days in MPC group (n=10) and 11 days in controls (n=27) (p=0.04). However, the median time to platelet engraftment was similar in MPC- and control groups in patients who received either Flu/Mel (37 vs 44 days, p=0.1) or Flu/Cy/TBI regimen (29 vs 31 days, p=0.5).

There was no difference in the cumulative incidence of day 100 non-relapse mortality (4% vs. 11%, p=0.6), 6th month mortality (25% vs 24%, p=0.6), grade II-IV acute GVHD (28% vs 27%, p=0.9), 2-year chronic GVHD (29% vs 20%; p=0.9) and estimates of 2-year OS (32% vs. 34%) between patients with ex-vivo expanded and unmanipulated CB units.

Conclusions: Transplantation of CB units expanded with MPC appeared to be safe and effective. Using MPC-expanded CB units significantly improved time to engraftment following Flu/Mel or Flu/Cy/TBI RIC regimens as compared with unmanipulated units.

Table 1: Patient characteristics

 

Control

(N=51)

MSC group

(N=27)

P value

Age, years (median, interquartile range)

57 (48, 63)

59 (49, 67)

0.3

Disease Status

CR1/CR2

20 (40%)

12 (45%)

Advanced

31 (61%)

15 (56%)

0.7

Disease Risk Index, n (%)

V. High/High

8 (16%)

9 (33%)

Intermediate

38 (75%)

16 (59%)

Comorbidity index

0-1

24 (47%)

13 (48%)

2-4

22 (43%)

11 (41%)

>4

5 (10%)

3 (11%)

0.97

Flu/Mel regimen

22 (43%)

16 (59%)

0.2

References

1.     de Lima M, McNiece I, Robinson SN, et al. Cord-blood engraftment with ex vivo mesenchymal-cell coculture. NEJM. 2012;367(24):2305-2315

Disclosures: Kaur: UT MD Anderson Cancer Center: Employment . Alousi: Therakos, Inc: Research Funding . Skerrett: Mesoblast: Employment . Burke: Mesoblast: Employment .

Previous Abstract | Next Abstract >>

*signifies non-member of ASH