Session: 611. Leukemias - Biology, Cytogenetics and Molecular Markers in Diagnosis and Prognosis: Poster I
Methods: To assess SNP rs16754 genotype, we directly sequenced WT1 exon 7 on available diagnostic specimens (N=492) from pediatric AML patients enrolled on CCG-2961. Patients with at least one minor (G) allele were considered SNP+, while patients homozygous for the major (A) allele were considered SNP−. We stratified SNP genotype by ethnicity and analyzed outcomes. In the 2961 trial, Induction Course 1 consisted of an intensively-timed hybrid regimen (Ida-DCTER: idarubicin / daunorubicin, dexamethasone, cytarabine, thioguanine, and etoposide). Patients with at least partial remission (<30% marrow blasts) were randomized to receive Induction Course 2 consisting of either a repeat course of Ida-DCTER (Regimen A) or Ida-FLAG (idarubicin, fludarabine, cytarabine; Regimen B). As most TRM events occurred within the first two cycles of chemotherapy, TRM was further examined separately on each of these two study arms.
Results: Twenty-eight percent of patients were SNP+; SNP positivity correlated with improved overall survival (5 year OS, 61% vs. 44%, p=0.009), although other outcome measures (CR, RR, DFS) were not significantly different between SNP+ and SNP− groups in the 2961 study. Prevalence of the SNP G allele varied significantly across ethnic groups (p=0.034): Asian (n=8/15, 53%), Hispanic (n=28/82, 34%), Caucasian (n=81/322, 25%), and African-American (n=10/47, 21%). When examining rs16754 genotype within ethnic subgroups, SNP+ patients had higher 5 year OS in each population (Hispanic: 49% vs. 37%, p=0.433; African-American: 56% vs. 30%, p=0.207; Asian: 88% vs. 29%, p=0.037; and Caucasian: 65% vs. 48%, p =0.051); statistical significance was approached in the Caucasian group and was achieved only in the Asian group. When patients of all ethnicities were considered together, TRM rates did not vary by rs16754 genotype. However, TRM rate was significantly lower in SNP+ African-American and Asian patients taken together compared to their SNP− counterparts (p=0.020) with a trend to significance taken individually (Asian: 0% vs. 43%, p=0.063; African-American: 0% vs. 25%, p=0.105). Further, for patients who survived Induction 1 and underwent Induction 2 randomization, SNP− Asian and African-American patients experienced higher rates of TRM from randomization disproportionately on Arm B (p=0.107), where TRM in SNP+ vs. SNP− patients was 0% vs 60% in Asian patients (Arm B n=9, p=0.110) and 0% vs. 14% in African-American patients (Arm B n=21, p=0.305).
Conclusions: As CCG-2961 comprised blocks of intensive inpatient therapy, this clinical trial provides a setting in which to study the effects of ethnicity on outcome while minimizing confounding non-biologic factors. African-American and Asian patients who were negative for SNP rs16754 experienced disproportionate TRM, particularly on experimental Arm B, which tested the then-novel agent fludarabine; conversely, the TRM rate was 0% for SNP+ patients of these two ethnicities. The biologic mechanism for this observation bears further study, as biomarkers predictive of drug-specific toxicity may inform treatment decisions in certain ethnic populations.
Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
See more of: Oral and Poster Abstracts
*signifies non-member of ASH